You know, when I first read this forum post, I thought any negative backlash would be an overreaction. If they were "Westernizing" the aesthetics, music, or the characters, I would actually welcome this. There's nothing wrong with branching out the look, feel, or even, yes, the themes and story. Chrono Cross was far from a carbon copy of Chrono Trigger in that regard and was easily just as good of a game.
Then I looked at the link and saw they want to "westernize" the gameplay of a Chrono sequel...
...this is epic FAIL.
The people who like Chrono Trigger and Chrono Cross like them because they are JRPGs. Although there's a lot of exploration and openness, it's not that "open world" and "create-a-character" junk that defines Western RPGS. Does Square Enix really think that completely redoing the series in a manner that is more popular will bring in sales, especially when doing so would undermine the existing innovative elements they have in the Chrono franchise?
Don't get me wrong. A radical gameplay departure is not always the end of the world, and given the time that has passed between the last original Chrono series game and now, there will be radical changes if the franchise is ever revived. But this is an actual genre shift in a long dormant series, so this approach is the worst of both worlds. It would alienate fans who love the series, and it wouldn't draw in new fans as new fans will be drawn to newer properties.
There are Chrono Trigger fans who never got over the battle system overhaul in Chrono Cross. Heck, there are Chrono Trigger fans who never got over Chrono Cross. Of course, any new sequel is going to have its critics just by virtue of being new, but to actually antagonize the fan base is not a good idea.