That's your choice, eh?
Firstly, pardon me for that; I posted this before noticing your post at the "Apologies Thread" and thus feel bad for being too straightforward. I wanted to reply earlier, but I got caught up with that wretched UV set moving as I moved the polygons about (Maya frustrates me).
Secondly, I asked you questions because I want them answered (few of them, as you've noticed, directly takes a hurtful aggressive stance, but you can avoid those -- although the others are honest, straight-forward questions). You have ignored my previous questions before, so it wouldn't be too displeased if you ignore these too; I've gotten used to that. Still, the choice is yours.
My next response will be at the appropriate thread. Just remember, that if you intend to provoke, antagonize or criticize anyone then be prepared for the same to be used against you. Same goes for judging a person's thoughts, actions and motivations, and the same again for questioning a person's integrity. No individual is flawless, which is why an aggressive stance also immediately makes him vulnerable. There are always "methods" to accomplish something, but I believe you've already realized that since our last argument in this thread. At the expense of risking my own position, simply because I consider you as an irreplaceable friend, I suggest you take up psychology -- or more specifically,
Lingual Psychology and
Communications. It will not only help you interact with people better with fewer errors but will also provide you powerful tools to give you a boost towards your goal.
If there's anything I can't watch it's the
Master of the Craft falling because of fragile integrity he thought he had already strengthened it.
