-siiigh.-
Here's where I smack whoever started this debate, smack twice whoever continued it, and give poor Ms. Cartman a cookie, because gosh darnit, hasn't that woman suffered enough?
Here's also where I give my brief opinion on abortion and whack myself a couple times upside the head, because I just can't resist. Life should be defined as individual organisms who are able to sustain their own processes as separate beings. That, for example, is why the virus cannot be considered living, since it requires living tissue to reproduce and continue existing, yet parasites such as ticks and tapeworms can be considered living, since they are physically able to exist outside animal influence (although it won't be the greatest existence ever or anything). I'm not trying to associate fetuses with viruses or anything, but it's the only viable explanation I can give — a fetus requires its host mother to develop the tissues and absorb the nutrition necessary for its future life outside the womb. Therefore, a fetus is not an individual life form, but an actual part of its mother's body until the umbilical cord is cut.
That being said, it should therefore be entirely up to the mother whether a part of her body should be removed or not. It's not the most pleasant explanation in the world, a fetus akin to a kidney or an appendix that can be removed without noticable harm to the mother's body, but in all cases that is exactly what a fetus is for the nine months it's housed in its mother's uterus. Whether a fetus should be aborted or not, however, should depend only on the mother's view. If she can emotionally deal with the loss of an unborn child, something that is not yet its own lifeform but will nevertheless become one in the future, that should be enough to allow for her to abort the fetus. If she is not emotionally able to come to terms with the loss, or if her religious views conflict with the topic of abortion in general, that's her perogative.
But it's more a debate over whether religious views should be impressed upon those without said views in order to preserve what some would term the "sanctity of life." As long as we have religion, it's a debate that will never reach a conclusion satisfying enough to both sides of the table.
Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm off to grab a baggie of ice for the two large palmprints upside my head.