Chrono Compendium

Zenan Plains - Site Discussion => Chrono / Gameplay Casual Discussion => Topic started by: The Black Wind on December 03, 2008, 11:58:24 pm

Title: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 03, 2008, 11:58:24 pm
I'm making this topic to finally spare the CTDS forum and its threads a ton of grief, and frankly to cover my own ass, as well.

My vote belongs to Chrono Trigger, and I will explain why in a later post and even fill any spectators in on some history.


I fixed your Thread for ya so it didn't just turn into a hate-filled thread. I assumed at least though that people coming here & participating in the polls likes at least one of them...
                                                                                              ~V_Translanka

Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 04, 2008, 11:38:19 am
Chrono Trigger - 0

Hmm thats going well
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: utunnels on December 04, 2008, 12:34:34 pm
Well, a 'both' option in a 'better' vote is not a good idea anyway. :lol:

ha, maybe those who vote for 'both' like trigger better but don't want to abandon cross, so...
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Xenterex on December 04, 2008, 01:41:41 pm
Trigger.

It plays out like a well-crafted story with each element of the game working together.  Gameplay quirks and gags exist and work in its structure because of how well it defines its mood and voice with its narrative perspective.  its greater emphasis on story based elements instead of technological specs are part of the reason why it still stands high as a product today, and not just a product of its time.

Cross, on the other hand, tries to use some of those same tools as Crono (despite it pushing to be a 'not Trigger') and those are some of the qualities that hold it down the most.  Serge's character as a silent protagonist doesn't work as well because their isn't a compensating voice within the party structure and plot associations to balance his hole out.  Instead narratives and information are largely presented from outside sources, or just generic samples because other characters don't have the ties in it to really give their 2¢ in driving the plot.  Furthermore, there isn't any expressive element for Serge to work within this story anyway.  The feel then becomes that the group/player are more 'acted upon' rather than being the driving action, particularly since the 'upon' sources come from more than one direction.  Just because the medium source is visual doesn't mean its beyond "Showing vs Telling" in story craft.  I'd say this same feel is part of why the Xenosaga project died out prematurely.

One is a quality veneer, using a variety of woods to create a strong under-structure that's a marvel itself, but also has a good layering on top to create a quality piece that compliments its placement in a room in form and function (and lasts) verses getting photo finish furniture with a cheap pale-wood interior. 
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 04, 2008, 02:08:30 pm
Cross wasn't exactly an unplayable game, but all of its faults took away from the first playthrough enjoyment while Trigger's only become apparent when you've thought about it too much. It's the one that needed a remake desperately, not Trigger.

CT's a much more satisfying gaming experience.

Also no offense Dark Serge but I want to punch you so much for your garish and retarded signature image. Sales and ratings don't mean shit, anyone familiar with the Twilight series knows that.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 04, 2008, 02:47:59 pm
I'm already done arguing about it. It's really opinion based after all. But Chrono Cross is the game that stole my heart. Not Trigger. Chrono Cross's plot wasn't clear at the very start but that's what made it deep. I didn't know what the heck was going on but I wanted to find out desperately. After the moment where you learn that Serge's already dead in Another World I was more and more driven to continue in the story. Paired with the amazing level design, amazing character design, and heart warming music, this was immediately my favorite game ever. As cool as Trigger was, it couldn't tip Cross.

As for Cross being a dodgy sequel, not really. Maybe you feel it that way but I at least could tell from early on in the game that this was the sequel to Chrono Trigger.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Celestial Insanity on December 04, 2008, 03:22:29 pm
Despite having played and becoming a huge fan of Trigger first (believe it or not), I personally prefer Cross by a moderately greater margin due to my opinion being quite the opposite from the "CT's a much more satisfying gaming experience" perception stated in a previous post. Not that CT isn't satisfying, it's pretty much a masterpiece; Just that the enjoyment and overall immersion I derived from CC was to a much larger extent.

Personally, and I'm going to be downright honest when I say this, I thought Cross's battle system was more fun and enjoyable than Trigger's. Yes, it had some rather unnecessary implementations, but it subsequently had a level of customization and innovation that really managed to intrigue me and was completely devoid of some of the problems I had with CT's battle system. The art direction, I felt, was an extreme improvement over CT's, and I really developed a strong liking for its music as well. The plot kept me interested and really managed to ensnare and consume me several times throughout the game, but on some occasions it had bad pacing. However, it did have a significantly larger impact on me than Trigger's, despite whatever arguments we're going to throw around pertaining to which of these is "more deep".

I can't speak for anyone else, and Cross did have its flaws, but I basically prefer it simply because I found it more satisfying than Trigger, contrary to what was stated earlier.

Quote
Sales and ratings don't mean shit, anyone familiar with the Twilight series knows that.

Except the Twilight series didn't exactly receive good critical ratings from my knowledge. :mrgreen:
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 04, 2008, 04:44:41 pm
Wow, that was harsh. Even I don't hate Chrono Cross enough to compare it to that godawful load of dragonshit that is Twilight. Nothing in the Chrono series deserves that. Now please, let us never speak of this again.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 04, 2008, 05:00:36 pm
Ah jeez, I didn't mean to be taken like that. Cross is in no way similar to Twilight, and despite all my complaints towards it I actually recommend Cross all the time.

I meant more that popularity and ratings shouldn't be someone's final say for something, they don't always reflect the quality.

More than that though I just dislike that sig. Sorry :(
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: chrono eric on December 04, 2008, 05:22:46 pm
As I've stated previously:

Dark Serge's sig is completely champion. Keep it, DS.

I believe that objectively Trigger is a better made game than Cross. But it doesn't matter, because they are both two of the greatest RPG's of all time. Most other RPG's don't even compare.


Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: KebreI on December 04, 2008, 05:37:51 pm
I voted for Cross I prefer to trigger by far, that being said I still don't like your signature DS.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 04, 2008, 05:47:16 pm
Please, could we keep this out of this. This is not an argument whether you like my signature or not. I don't like yours either.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: IStoleTheStars on December 04, 2008, 06:51:16 pm
Both are amazing games, but I picked Trigger for these reasons:

- Nostalgic value
- Story was cool, and didn't have me banging me head on the sidewalk trying to figure it out like parts of Cross did
- Dream Team worked on it
- Gato
- Finally, Trigger (even with its paradoxes) just had a more cohesive feel to it.

This being said, I don't hate Cross by any means. It's just second place to Trigger to me...... But a very close second
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 04, 2008, 07:07:07 pm
This is a long overdue response to Dark Serge's post from the CTDS thread, which will be made here.

Nice attempt at trashing CC but now let me tell you why I am right and you are wrong (also see my sig)

The problem here is you saying "Many crappy characters" and "Kato cancelled my Magus 'cause of them", alright let's divide that into points shall we.

First of all, if you're going to quote me, quote something that I've actually said. I never called any of the characters in Chrono Cross "crappy", but merely unnecessary. We didn't need them, and I felt that the effort that went into designing 30 characters could have instead been used to improve the other 10 and make them into even more memorable characters.

1. Too many underdeveloped characters that don't work together and have no relationship.

WRONG. Most of the characters had a backstory developed whereas some characters in Trigger didn't. Let's take Ayla shall we? Aight. What do we know of her? Hmmmm. We know nothing of her past. We know she likes Kino and we know she wants to fight Reptites. We also know she has a strong will of surviving and that she probably had a link with Guardia (even though this is never confirmed). Well that's it for her. What a great development. Yes, Cross has those too, ofcourse. Take Draggy for example, probably one of the most underdeveloped characters that was put in for fun. I don't know which other characters you think are underdeveloped; I know there are some of them. The problem is that you seem to think that Trigger didn't have these, which is wrong, the only difference is that in Trigger they weren't playable

I don't deny that there are characters who don't exactly have a Shakespearean background in Chrono Trigger. Although Ayla is definitely the weakest of the bunch in that regard, I will give you that -- she is still a vital part of the game. First of all, she is the one that they need in order to acquire Dreamstone to repair the Masamune. Second, when the Gate Key went missing, they would have been left stranded forever if Ayla didn't help them. It is also strongly implied that she is a distant ancestor of Zeal/Guardia, as you noted. And despite her fighting with the Reptites and being a far more primitive race, she displays compassion when she tries to get Azala to escape with them. She is among the physically strongest of your party, and shares plenty of double and triple techs with the rest of the cast. This is already more than anyone can say for over half the playable roster of Chrono Cross.

Let's get down to a more vital character: Serge. Although a mute as well, Serge's past is something that absorbs you into the game the moment you see him holding a bloody knife in the dream sequence. He didn't develop as a character at all, but of course neither did Crono, so Serge has the advantage regardless. Switching bodies with Lynx also added an interesting twist to the story because enemies became friends, and friends became enemies. However, although Crono was a speechless character with no past, his supporting cast had enough charisma and unique traits so that you could pretty much determine what kind of character he was through them. When Crono was set to be executed, Lucca went in to save his life, and Marle pretty much told her father and the whole Guardian empire to go fuck themselves. When Crono dies, everyone except for Magus is deeply effected by this, and they go to great lengths just for the hope of bringing him back to life, which they all knew was absurd but gave it a shot anyway. And when it worked, they were overjoyed, and you had a powerhouse back on your team. From what I remember, the only person who really seemed to give a rat's ass about Serge was Kid.

As for not working together, some of them have double and triple techs. Not a lot, but they're there.

I am aware of this, as I've never stated that they didn't exist in Chrono Cross. However, they were disappointingly rare. I could definitely overlook their lack of plot development if they at least shared double/triple techs with at least the mandatory characters of the game, but we didn't even get that. Take a moment to look back on all those characters and think of what you could or would have added if you were in the developers' shoes, and then tell me that you were satisfied with what they gave us. If you are, that's fine -- I'm not trying to convince you to NOT like Cross, but merely respect my reasoning.

Not to mention you can equip any element on any character you wish (almost) to variate their actions.

I felt that this made the characters even less unique, actually. It didn't really matter who I chose to be in my party because as long as I allocated the right elements to the right character, I was pretty much guaranteed to win.

And to be honest, the amount of characters shows the fucking HUGE world you're playing in. Even though you can timetravel in Chrono Trigger I always feel like I'm in a small world with the small amount of characters and small world map. You're right, there's some characters in Cross I never used to this day. All the reason more to go and play it again.

But that's exactly what I'm saying, even though everything is bigger in Chrono Cross, that doesn't automatically make it better. Chrono Trigger does more with less, and Chrono Cross does the complete opposite. Even though you go back and use those other characters, you're not going to get a much different experience because of the fact that you can just equip any element to them. Superficially you'll be using brand new characters, but you'll find that your strategies are going to basically remain the same.

2. Kato cancelled Magus 'cause of em.

A load of bullshit. I don't see how Magus wouldn't have fit in right there in the role of Magil next to Serge and Kid. The other characters could be developed, so why not Magus? A big f*cking load of bullshit and a crappy excuse why Magus isn't in the game.

Is that so? I guess you can take that up with Kato himself, tough guy.

Quote
Masato Kato: To let the cat out of the bag, in the early stages of development, Guile was indeed meant to be Magus. In our original plan, the true identity of Guile was supposed to be Magus after the events in Trigger. (At the end of Trigger, Magus [a.k.a. Janus in Trigger and Magil in Radical Dreamers] disappeared into a Time Gate to go searching for his big sister, Schala, who was lost somewhere in time.) However, as the game's development progressed and we decided to use such a huge number of playable characters, we decided not to make him be Magus. We thought it was impossible to portray the relationship between Magus and Schala adequately in this game. So we changed tracks, made the colors of the Magus character design paler, and turned him into Guile, the magician. In a way, it's a pity, as I really would like to have seen the valiant figure of Magus come to life again.

You can either sit there and try to tell me with a straight face that you know more about what's going on with the story of the Chrono series than the main writer himself, or you can admit you were wrong and this argument ends here.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 04, 2008, 07:25:28 pm
I voted both b/c they're both really good games. If I had to pick only one of them, though, I'd pick Trigger.

The sway was too close for me to just say "Trigger FTW" and be done here.

I loved Cross despite the hardships I went through, but I love Trigger better b/c of the neat shit you can do that you didn't do in Cross.

EDIT: @Black Wind

Long post is long. Fails due to boredom and lack of excitement.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 04, 2008, 07:30:07 pm
Holy jeez. Here we go again.

Anyway, you say that Ayla's character development is "more then you can say for half the Cross cast". Well it's not really much development at all. They could have just as easily gotten Dreamstone off another prehistoric guy. And really, they could have followed those footsteps without Ayla accompanying them. It's not like they're blind or something. She displays compassion....... I..... guess? Your point being? Every character in Cross does that.

And nah, Kid is not the only one who cares about Serge. If you'd paid attention you'd know that. Why do you think they all join up with Serge in the first place? Razzly, for example, one of the supposedly minor characters, leaves her people behind after it just got trashed just because she wants to help Serge out so much. I could seriously write up motivations for every character, but there's the encyclopedia for that already. Everyone has his personal reason to go with Serge, and over time they grow close to him. Ofcourse you don't see it for every of them 'cause you can't have em all in your party. But especially Karsh's last line if you beat him with the Time Devourer is something that really got me. He's a guy you meet from the beginning and you learn about his past and future. And there's more of those characters.

As for character variation; there was plenty imo. Yeah you could equip any element on any character. But that's a lame excuse. Every character had his own damn accent, for heaven's sake. Every character looked totally different (not like Trigger where Toriyama's creations all look the same), every character animated, walked and ran differently. Even if some characters had an annoying accent, that doesn't erase the fact that there's more variation then in Trigger.

And nah I'm not saying Kato is wrong or anything. I'm sure he wanted Magus in it. But I think he exaggerated when he said that. If you think for yourself you'll find this too. Because Magus would have perfectly fit right in there next to Serge. The amount of characters is not much of an excuse.

I'm not trying to convince you to like Cross either. I just get the feeling you don't take it for what it really is.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 04, 2008, 08:51:50 pm
Quote
Anyway, you say that Ayla's character development is "more then you can say for half the Cross cast". Well it's not really much development at all.
Wait, are you admitting that at least half the Cross cast had less development than Ayla?

Ayla's past is a lot more hidden than the other characters, I bet a lot of you don't know that she found and raised Kino. A lot of her character comes from her actions and what she says, which were all interchangeable things for the characters in Cross. Accents and backstory/motivation completely unrelated to the quest at hand do not a deep character make, it comes from seeing them in action. The characters in Cross weren't alive, they were equipment.

There's more "variation" in the design of Cross characters because there's a heaping pile of them. No one's gonna debate whether or not they look cool, because everyone knows the graphics and design were one of the good points of Cross, but they aren't really relevant in a "which has the better story and characters" argument since you could switch the sprites for Orcha and Orlha and not even tell the difference in play.

If Magus was in the game you know everyone would play as the Radical Dreamers awesome combo. Look at how most folks already keep Glenn or Norris in the party over whatsisface.

I take Cross as a beautiful mess.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 04, 2008, 08:55:27 pm
Cross was an excellent game in terms of storyline, gameplay, hell, the graphics were good.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 04, 2008, 09:08:46 pm
Quote
Anyway, you say that Ayla's character development is "more then you can say for half the Cross cast". Well it's not really much development at all.
Wait, are you admitting that at least half the Cross cast had less development than Ayla?

No I'm not, how did you get that idea...

Ayla's past is a lot more hidden than the other characters, I bet a lot of you don't know that she found and raised Kino. A lot of her character comes from her actions and what she says, which were all interchangeable things for the characters in Cross. Accents and backstory/motivation completely unrelated to the quest at hand do not a deep character make, it comes from seeing them in action. The characters in Cross weren't alive, they were equipment.

Raised Kino huh? Couldn't find that anywhere in the game. Care to give a source? And how the hell is that relevant to the main plot or quest at hand? Ayla doesn't have any development related to the quest at hand yet you badmouth Cross characters because of this very thing. And to be honest, most of them did have some development with the quest at hand. Not all of them, but for a lot of them you saw that they desired a wish from the Frozen Flame, which in turn had something to do with their past. You say a past and future don't make a great character, but supplying some Dreamstone does?

There's more "variation" in the design of Cross characters because there's a heaping pile of them. No one's gonna debate whether or not they look cool, because everyone knows the graphics and design were one of the good points of Cross, but they aren't really relevant in a "which has the better story and characters" argument since you could switch the sprites for Orcha and Orlha and not even tell the difference in play.

Orcha and Orlha have different ways of talking and walking, they both have different pasts and different personalities. I can easily tell the difference between any Cross character.

If Magus was in the game you know everyone would play as the Radical Dreamers awesome combo. Look at how most folks already keep Glenn or Norris in the party over whatsisface.

I don't think so. Because Cross has a lot of characters there's at least some of them everyone can identify themselves with. And these will probably become the characters of their choice. Even if Magus was in Chrono Cross, anyone who didn't like him in Trigger wouldn't have him around this time either.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Romana on December 04, 2008, 09:10:52 pm
EDIT: @Black Wind

Long post is long. Fails due to boredom and lack of excitement.

This site thrives on lengthy discussion and debates, it's why it's so well developed and long-lasting.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Boo the Gentleman Caller on December 04, 2008, 09:16:56 pm
I chose both because I really truly like both games.  I like them for different reasons, however.  They are both masterpieces, in my opinion, and trying to choose one is like trying to choose one parent over another (or one child from another).
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 04, 2008, 09:26:47 pm
This site thrives on lengthy discussion and debates, it's why it's so well developed and long-lasting.

Those kinds of long posts are fine. I was referring to posts like his that are long. They fail for the reasons I stated in that post.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 04, 2008, 10:56:28 pm
I voted both b/c they're both really good games. If I had to pick only one of them, though, I'd pick Trigger.

The sway was too close for me to just say "Trigger FTW" and be done here.

I loved Cross despite the hardships I went through, but I love Trigger better b/c of the neat shit you can do that you didn't do in Cross.

EDIT: @Black Wind

Long post is long. Fails due to boredom and lack of excitement.

You're a complete fucking joke, Shadow. At least your friend is capable of debate. If all you can do is regurgitate what other people say, you're better off not posting. You fail at life, now get out of my thread.


IRONY
                            ~V_Translanka

Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 04, 2008, 10:59:07 pm
...get out of my thread.

Huh, when were you given mod powers? Voting both and loving CC for what it has was not someone else's opinion. It's my own.

Speaking of mods, can someone do us all a favor and hit Shade Blackman with the BanHammer? I don't like getting ripped off.

EDIT:

REPORT'D.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: x_XTacTX_x on December 04, 2008, 11:34:30 pm
...get out of my thread.

Huh, when were you given mod powers? Voting both and loving CC for what it has was not someone else's opinion. It's my own.

Speaking of mods, can someone do us all a favor and hit Shade Blackman with the BanHammer? I don't like getting ripped off.

EDIT:

REPORT'D.


Fuck dude, I've been trying to be nice to you in your entirety on the forum but this is just getting fucking ridiculous. You are one of the biggest acceptance-thriving tools I've ever had the displeasure of talking to. I could count the number of meaningful, sensible posts you've made on one hand, with the rest of them being childlike spam or an attempt at trying to hard to be funny or get attention from another user. I find it hard to believe that you're seventeen as your profile says, because you act like a butthurt preteen. It is very, very hard to get me to tell someone off without keeping respect in mind, but you've accomplished it. So please, either stop logging down every thread you see with meaningless, trivial posts now or get the fuck out of the Chrono Compendium.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Xenterex on December 05, 2008, 12:29:55 am
little sidetracking here.  Its internet courtesy to refrain from flaming, especially in discussion threads.  If you have the uncontrollable urge to have to chide someone directly, that's what PMs are for.  Leave the collateral damage to a minimum.
---------------

Quote
There's more "variation" in the design of Cross characters because there's a heaping pile of them. No one's gonna debate whether or not they look cool, because everyone knows the graphics and design were one of the good points of Cross, but they aren't really relevant in a "which has the better story and characters" argument
 

Cross variation in character designs (and mannerisms) combined with the combat systems customization versatility
are simple game gimmicks designed to allow people someone that they can like to allow themselves to associate with the story.  As far as 'characterization' goes in a literal sense, there's been some of the general misunderstandings portrayed here.  The 'past' isn't necessarily a part of a character at all.  Many characters/protagonists don't have mentioned pasts because it doesn't necessarily pertain to the story, and they still work.  Does Crono have a past?  He has a Mom, that presumably gave birth to him, and he's been raised somehow between then and the 'now' of the story, so yes he has a past.  Do we need to know it? No, its not included because it doesn't effect anything in the game.  Do we know what happened to ANY of the Trigger characters between a few key segments?  Did they go to school?  Does the world have an observable religion for them to follow on a given day, and if so, what is that day?  Who cares.  Those are details that don't pertain to the characters as they are involved in the story.  One of the hardest, and yet most rewarding, processes any story goes through is cropping.  The thing that gives Trigger more characterization than Cross is how its characters are apart of a role archetype, and also how they challenge it.  And we get this from concise scenes.

As a character what is Crono?  He is the protagonist, or at least initially.  He's a flat character (lazy youth who is brave,)  yet flat is not a derogatory statement in how Crono is used as a character.  I propose that Crono is not excessively dynamic because he is a symbolic character; and he symbolizes 'time'.  Time*, "progress as affecting people and things" (and named for it) is exactly what Crono does.  He is given a lead role initially because he's a flat, or stable surface, to allow the audience to see the change that occurs through the other characters, particularly in his death, and recovery.  He is the progress of how the other dynamic, more rounded, characters are viewed in their initial archetype, and in how they change it; as a means that drives the story.

Even Ayla works into this system. An apparent flat character designed to be and acts on strength.  Given her highlight periods, she is the protagonist of the past.  Once the past portions are completed (because the focus in on what Lavos does, and not so much did) she does take a bit of a step down, and she's a 'guardian'.  However, in her 'flat' characterization, she has purpose and even change.  Her conflict with Azla both defines and breaks her philosophy in life.  This change is her philosophy is reflected in her role to the parties struggle against Lavos.  There isn't another caveman the party can use other than Ayle because of the role she fills as 'strongest' in her dynamic contribution to the game and story.

I could go on in this capacity, but needless to say that is one of the reasons why I like Trigger more than Cross; its characters have 'character' in relation to the story, and not just 'detail'.  Despite its character design versatility, aimed for everyone to find someone to relate to, they missed a portion.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 02:20:42 am
...get out of my thread.

Huh, when were you given mod powers? Voting both and loving CC for what it has was not someone else's opinion. It's my own.

Speaking of mods, can someone do us all a favor and hit Shade Blackman with the BanHammer? I don't like getting ripped off.

EDIT:

REPORT'D.

I didn't realize that it required mod powers to create a thread.

Anyway, I really don't give a raccoon's ass whether you like or love Chrono Cross. This is where you and I are different. Even if I hated CC with a passion when I played it 8 years ago, I haven't antagonized anyone who doesn't agree with me.  I'm not trying to get you to change sides, and quite frankly I don't want you to because I'd prefer not to be associated with pretentious morons that don't respect others' opinions. When I first said that CC was a piece of shit, I was attacked for not explaining why. When I explained why, I was attacked for posting off-topic. Now I'm posting on-topic, and I'm not entertaining enough? You're so pathetic that it raises the bar for entertainment to a level that I can only aspire to achieve.

Dark Serge: I'm going to call it a day and simply agree to disagree on this issue for now. Perhaps I won't hate CC as much if I give it a more recent playthrough and appreciate it for what it is rather than what my expectations were. Fair enough and to be honest, I was planning on doing that anyway because it's series canon. Although you started off arrogant, at least you were mature enough to actually debate with me on the issue rather than spout utter nonsense. I'll respect that much.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: BROJ on December 05, 2008, 02:42:21 am
Shadow, you're an asshole. If I have to see you, of all people, bashing people's thoroughness and saying crap like this:
Quote
EDIT: @Black Wind

Long post is long. Fails due to boredom and lack of excitement.
I'm going to call for a popular census to remove your vexing, banal, erratic and crappy 4-chan reference spewing account.

Shape up, and don't even try to take the high moral ground.

BTW, I feel you should apologize to The Black Wind, whether he cares or not, for being a jerk.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Daniel Krispin on December 05, 2008, 03:39:33 am
I just must say, that's an interesting result to see, and I wouldn't have expected that before I clicked submit on the poll. This being the Compendium, I would have guessed the majority to be for both, yet to have Cross higher than Trigger? Unexpected and interesting. I know there are some that do prefer it. Personally, I'm always torn, for which I selected both. As I see it, in terms of music, both rank highly, though I think Trigger has a more classic sound to it, whilst Cross holds the emotional ground. Character design I'd definitely have to give to Cross... I was never a major fan of Toiyrama's style. Just an opinion on that one. Character development... I'd have to go with Cross. I know, I know, there is a multiplicity of characters that do nothing in Cross, yet for those central characters of Cross, I think the development is greater than that of Trigger. Art design, can't pick. Storyline... have to go Trigger on that one. And so on, which in the end divides the line rather down the middle. My big question is, and my great hope, will the third game, whatever it may be named in eventuality, cause the majority to see it with the same equality?

After all, what you see here is a rare thing. Judging by the results, Cross is at least as well liked, if not better, than Trigger. That means one of the best RPGs ever made had a sequal that was even better? Tell me how often THAT happens. Not just in the video game world, but in anything. Even the Odyssey wasn't as good as the Iliad... right?
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 04:08:27 am
A stunning development, indeed... The people have chosen, and they love both games. I was actually hoping for a bit more finality from this poll between CT and CC, but alas. I suppose it really wasn't fair to expect everyone to choose between the two games without hesitation.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Daniel Krispin on December 05, 2008, 04:30:25 am
By the way, nice avatar movie.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: utunnels on December 05, 2008, 05:46:30 am
I voted Chrono Cross, just because I 'like'  the story better.
Maybe that 's so called 'first impressions are most lasting', I don't mean Trigger is worse than Cross.
I played Radical Dreamers first, before I even knew the story of Chrono Cross or Chrono Trigger(don't say I'm from Mars...)
Then I felt it was interesting, so I made a Chinese translation patch. That's when I wanted to read the story of this series, but I didn't until the translation was almost done because I didn't want to be influenced.
Then I began to read the story of Chrono Cross, and articles of this site...

BTW, I didn't know there're dual or triple techs in Chrono Corss before I read a walkthrough. It has more than 40 playable characters, maybe it's hard to pick 2 characters who happen to have dual techs by chance...
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 05, 2008, 07:30:32 am
Dark Serge: I'm going to call it a day and simply agree to disagree on this issue for now. Perhaps I won't hate CC as much if I give it a more recent playthrough and appreciate it for what it is rather than what my expectations were. Fair enough and to be honest, I was planning on doing that anyway because it's series canon. Although you started off arrogant, at least you were mature enough to actually debate with me on the issue rather than spout utter nonsense. I'll respect that much.

Thanks.

*Removed my sig because I feel it's kinda stupid now. I had some fun making it, but it won't do anything but either piss people off or make them a tiny tidbit happy.*
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dunsparce on December 05, 2008, 10:06:08 am
Once again, Radical Dreamers is Ignored :<

It doesn't matter if it's no longer part of the main continuity, it's still a Chrono game through and through.

I would vote for all 3 games if it was an option.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 05, 2008, 12:11:16 pm
Yeah, I might have picked Radical Dreamers over Trigger if it was in the running, unless there was a "CT and RD are best, Cross second" option.

What would be very awesome is RD done with the CC engine, but Serge needs to speak!
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 05, 2008, 12:16:05 pm
That gives me an idea. Why don't we put CC elements in RD? To explain, I'm proposing we take RD, change the people's appearances to match their CC counterparts, keep Serge's ability to speak (:lol:),  and then add anything from CC that wasn't originally in RD into RD itself, like the Other World concept, Lynx being more than a creep trying to get the Frozen Flame, FATE, Chronopolis, even the Time Devourer.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 05, 2008, 12:36:12 pm
So basically just give Serge a line every now and again and play Cross

NO THANKS~

Although I suppose it would be interesting if Kid's Schala status was altered slightly and after the events of RD, Serge finds her again and they beat the Time Devourer together, but that's terrible pacing for a game and part of the beauty of RD was that it had so simple a story.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 12:53:05 pm
I'm unfamiliar with Radical Dreamers. I heard that it was the original sequel to Chrono Trigger that eventually became Chrono Cross (or something along those lines) but that's about it. It sounds as if some of you somehow managed to play it or at least read the script.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Dark Serge on December 05, 2008, 12:57:15 pm
http://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Radical_Dreamers.html
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 05, 2008, 01:07:15 pm
Basically they cut Radical Dreamers in half and put it into CC as the Viper Manor infiltration thing.

It's a visual novel type text game. You play as Serge, only instead of being a fishy mute he's an ex-musician thief narrator working with Kid and Magil(Magus). The game is mostly sneaking around a very spooky Viper Manor, learning about Lynx through the rooms and characters, getting affection points from Kid, and looking for the Frozen Flame (which looks more like Dreamstone than what it was in Cross). I think one of the reasons I disliked Cross was that I got used to RD's versions of certain characters and saw them chopped in half or changed to completely different things.

It's really great and definately worth a play-through or five. Once you beat it, save a state and load it up to play the other storylines.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 02:08:22 pm
Uh.

Quote
Magil: Caught Between Love and Adventure

This scenario can be accessed by falling asleep, following Kid, examining the desk in the study, and then entering Riddel's room.

Magil in reality is a man named Gilbert, who has pined for Riddel all his life. He and Riddel exchange their affections, but Riddel recoils when Gilbert asks about their marriage vows made some time ago in the garden of the Manor. As she softens up to him once more, her servant Noelle comes in, and reveals that Riddel was assigned a suitor. Gilbert is wounded by this, and struggles to convince Riddel to go with him. The maid is alarmed by Kid's insistence on finding the Frozen Flame, and alerts the guards; Riddel notes that someday, Gilbert may return and be friends. Gilbert will have none of this, and throws Riddel over his shoulder as he defeats the guards. As the Radical Dreamers and Riddel reach the courtyard, the occupants of the Manor emerge and bid them farewell; Lynx, the foster father of the bride, tears up. Gilbert points to the morning sun, and notes that it is "our Frozen Flame."

What the shit?
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 02:15:37 pm
Basically they cut Radical Dreamers in half and put it into CC as the Viper Manor infiltration thing.

It's a visual novel type text game. You play as Serge, only instead of being a fishy mute he's an ex-musician thief narrator working with Kid and Magil(Magus). The game is mostly sneaking around a very spooky Viper Manor, learning about Lynx through the rooms and characters, getting affection points from Kid, and looking for the Frozen Flame (which looks more like Dreamstone than what it was in Cross). I think one of the reasons I disliked Cross was that I got used to RD's versions of certain characters and saw them chopped in half or changed to completely different things.

Well, according to the synopsis the Frozen Flame originated from the Mammon Machine in Radical Dreamers. In Chrono Cross, it was a fragment of Lavos, so it doesn't surprise me that it looked differently. Lavos itself means "big fire" in Ayla's language.

I still believe that should there be another Chrono Cross that Janus/Magus/Magil/Guile/Gilbert/WHATEVER YOU WANT TO CALL HIM should be a mandatory character in the new version, especially for the Viper Manor and Fort Dragonia scenarios.

Edit: Whoops, that wasn't supposed to be a double post. I thought I was editing the first one. Oh well.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 05, 2008, 02:29:45 pm
The Gilbert one is hilarious in how over-the-top romantic and gushy it is. Magil's only completely Magus in the first scenario.

And I'd second the Magil as a mandatory character in Cross, but I really dislike the Guile CTDS thing. I'd like a remake of CC where Guile is MAGIL, in his RD form.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 05, 2008, 02:34:51 pm
Thirded. Let him keep the name "Guile" though. IMO "Magil" is kinda obvious to anyone who knows his CT name.

Also, can anyone get a drawing of Magil from RD? None of the screenshots from RD here on the Compendium give me a clear shot.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 02:36:06 pm
Unfortunately, I think the fact that Magus lost his memory confirms that he's going to be Guile. Magil definitely remembered who he was and everything that happened, but Guile was just clueless. Were there any other differences between Guile and Magil?
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 05, 2008, 02:37:45 pm
Age, maybe? They might not change Guile's age, unless they decide to change Magus' age. If I recall, Magus was in his 40s, and Guile was around his mid-20s.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: maggiekarp on December 05, 2008, 02:52:37 pm
Magil looked "about thirty" while Guile's 24 or something. Guile's about drinking, gambling, enigma, going "heh" and "interesting...", but for the most part he actually sort of talks like Magil. Like if he was younger, less serious, and didn't know who he's supposed to be!

I like Magil more because he's what Magus originally developed into. I'd like Guile more if he lost his memory some other way, instead of Magus pussing out, and if he actually had some sort of realization and conclusion instead of "well that was weird, I'ma go get a drink".
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: utunnels on December 05, 2008, 02:52:56 pm
I'm just curious do you guys think Cross's story is hard to understand if you didn't play Trigger first? Because I read the script first and got fully spoiled so I don't have that feeling...
At least you won't get any troubles understanding RD's story even if you don't know Trigger at all, it's quite short and clear.

BTW to Shadow D. Darkman, Magil(the name came from CC's script, if you read the report in Chronopolis, that's probably why Demiforce used that name)'s Japanese name was 'Gil'(think he's Gilbert in one scenario...).
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Celestial Insanity on December 05, 2008, 03:01:01 pm
I didn't find it all that difficult to understand, though I did play Trigger first. Now, I didn't get everything plot-wise in my first playthrough, but that was precisely one of the reasons I loved Cross's plot. I can't consider the sheer complexity a flaw if it was an aspect I thoroughly enjoyed.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 05, 2008, 03:06:20 pm
Magus looked to be in his late 20s/early 30s at the most, and we don't know exactly what year Magus was thrown into at the end of CTDS. We assume it was 1000 A.D., but for all we know it could have been 1020 A.D. just in time for Chrono Cross.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Entity on December 07, 2008, 06:32:50 am
I prefer CT, but I also enjoyed CC a lot.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Jutty on December 10, 2008, 07:10:18 am
I prefer CT, but neither game was bad. I was kinda overwhelmed by all the characters in CC and didn't feel the attachment that I felt for the characters in CT. Anyway why would you have a sig that bashes CT on a Chrono forum? I really think it's going to come down to which game you played first. Chrono Trigger was my first rpg ever. Just like FFVII was my first Final Fantasy and my favorite.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 10, 2008, 08:24:59 am
IMO both CT and CC are good games. My sig shows that I think CC is just as good as, if not a tiny bit better than, CT.

I've seen vids of FF7, but I don't think I could ever understand the battle system or the Materia thing. Advent Children was an excellent movie IMO, and I've seen someone bashing The Spirits Within somewhere here. Just want to say that TSW was a good movie, but Advent Children does so much better, but nowhere near enough to justify bashing TSW.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Void on December 11, 2008, 03:51:28 am
Both for sure, imo you can't have one without the other.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 11, 2008, 10:25:39 am
Got that right.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: The Black Wind on December 11, 2008, 02:16:55 pm
I've seen vids of FF7, but I don't think I could ever understand the battle system or the Materia thing. Advent Children was an excellent movie IMO, and I've seen someone bashing The Spirits Within somewhere here. Just want to say that TSW was a good movie, but Advent Children does so much better, but nowhere near enough to justify bashing TSW.

It's intimidating at first, especially when you're watching the game instead of playing it. But eventually you'll get used to it and everything makes sense. It's even more satisfying when you come up with your own materia combinations that make you into an unstoppable party (which I've already gone over in another thread, though I forget which). That said, I think Crisis Core for PSP had an even better materia system than the original FFVII.

As for The Spirits Within, to be honest I've never watched it. I was just never interested in seeing it while it was in theaters, and frankly I've forgotten about it ever since. I think Advent Children would have been a much better choice (not to mention more profitable) for a theatrical release instead. That would have been amazing.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Jutty on December 11, 2008, 06:44:45 pm
IMO both CT and CC are good games. My sig shows that I think CC is just as good as, if not a tiny bit better than, CT.

I've seen vids of FF7, but I don't think I could ever understand the battle system or the Materia thing. Advent Children was an excellent movie IMO, and I've seen someone bashing The Spirits Within somewhere here. Just want to say that TSW was a good movie, but Advent Children does so much better, but nowhere near enough to justify bashing TSW.

Final Fantasy series is a lot more harder than Chrono series, but it's not like impossible or anything. Materia system is pretty simple once you mess around with it and find what you like. There is also a graphic mod for the pc version that makes the game look a lot better, and The Spirits Within was extra shitty.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 11, 2008, 06:52:29 pm
...and The Spirits Within was extra shitty.

That's where I disagree. TSW was a good movie. True, AC is better, but it's not better enough to justify ANYONE bashing TSW, not even you.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Xenterex on December 12, 2008, 02:00:22 pm
Quote
True, AC is better, but it's not better enough to justify ANYONE bashing TSW, not even you.

In terms of animation quality and stylization, plus purpose of movie yea.  I did like AC, but I found some of the dialogue poorly written to what was a pretty good movie setup.  TSW was also good, though I think that people ending up not liking it because of how it tried to make its cg look too much like real people.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: BROJ on December 21, 2008, 10:34:55 pm
IMO both CT and CC are good games. My sig shows that I think CC is just as good as, if not a tiny bit better than, CT.

I've seen vids of FF7, but I don't think I could ever understand the battle system or the Materia thing. Advent Children was an excellent movie IMO, and I've seen someone bashing The Spirits Within somewhere here. Just want to say that TSW was a good movie, but Advent Children does so much better, but nowhere near enough to justify bashing TSW.

Final Fantasy series is a lot more harder than Chrono series, but it's not like impossible or anything. Materia system is pretty simple once you mess around with it and find what you like. There is also a graphic mod for the pc version that makes the game look a lot better, and The Spirits Within was extra shitty.
You want a game that's hard? Try Star Ocean: TSS on Universe Mode. Whew... it was hard, but it was fun. Also, I wouldn't go as far as to say TSW was a horrible movie, but it wasn't a good movie either ─ and it certainly wasn't worthy of the Final Fantasy 'seal of approval', so to speak.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: V_Translanka on December 22, 2008, 09:35:24 pm
TSW was just an average sci-fi with pretty animation stamped with the FF name.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 22, 2008, 10:04:27 pm
So it has nothing to do with FF at all, despite the title?
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: V_Translanka on December 23, 2008, 01:07:31 am
Well, not really...I mean, no more than anything else...I mean, the FF series is fairly ambiguous as a series already...There's a few vague references between games & stuff, but mostly it's just easter eggs & carry overs like Sid & the Cids, the chocobo sticker or whatever on the briefcase and I guessyou could link the "spirits" Aki gathers as being kind of like the crystals or something...
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 23, 2008, 01:25:57 am
So it is FF, but in and of itself it's a rip-off. Correct?
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: chrono eric on December 23, 2008, 02:23:54 am
Can you by definition rip yourself off?

It just was a poorly titled movie. FF fanboys were pissed because it wasn't "FF enough". They probably should have just given it an independent title.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: FalconHit on December 23, 2008, 04:33:50 am
Dark Serge: I'm going to call it a day and simply agree to disagree on this issue for now. Perhaps I won't hate CC as much if I give it a more recent playthrough and appreciate it for what it is rather than what my expectations were. Fair enough and to be honest, I was planning on doing that anyway because it's series canon. Although you started off arrogant, at least you were mature enough to actually debate with me on the issue rather than spout utter nonsense. I'll respect that much.

Thanks.

*Removed my sig because I feel it's kinda stupid now. I had some fun making it, but it won't do anything but either piss people off or make them a tiny tidbit happy.*

I don't like to drag up things, but I think that's a really big thing of you to do DS.
I was one of the people that thought that sig was kind of backward, like you don't like CT at all. My opinion of you is reversed as of now.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: BROJ on December 23, 2008, 10:56:05 am
Can you by definition rip yourself off?

It just was a poorly titled movie. FF fanboys were pissed because it wasn't "FF enough". They probably should have just given it an independent title.
I don't think it was as much of a 'rip-off', as a blatant whoring of the Final Fantasy name in order to get fans to attend the movie in theatres and buy the DVD. Btw, I'm not a Final Fantasy fanboy, it just wasn't a good product ─ pretty, but not good.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 23, 2008, 11:05:46 am
I thought it was a good movie IMO, I just didn't see why they put the FF in the title. That was really stupid of them.

:picardno
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: chrono eric on December 23, 2008, 06:23:58 pm
I don't think it was as much of a 'rip-off', as a blatant whoring of the Final Fantasy name in order to get fans to attend the movie in theatres and buy the DVD. Btw, I'm not a Final Fantasy fanboy, it just wasn't a good product ─ pretty, but not good.

Naw I wasn't calling you a FF fanboy. I was more referring to Shadow D. Darkman's comment about ripping off FF. Not only can you technically not rip yourself off, but they didn't take anything from FF to rip off in the first place. They just named it FF. I agree with you that it was a complete whoring of the FF name.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Jutty on December 24, 2008, 09:22:15 pm
I just find the movie to not be interesting at all. It's nothing to do with it not being FF enough, which is true, had nothing to do with it being a crappy movie. I just thought it was a pretty movie with a boring cookie cutter sci-fi plot-line. If it was released by a different company without FF branding, it would have faded into obscurity with Savio Vega and Crystal Pepsi.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Xenterex on December 26, 2008, 04:42:42 am
Quote
it would have faded into obscurity with Savio Vega and Crystal Peps
  While the FF tag on it probably did more harm than good to the movie itself, I don't think it would've faded into obscurity without it.  First off, it was still a Square product, which that alone probably merits enough attention to be comparable to FF alone, plus the project design of using high detail cg to emulate people was an interesting undertaking at the time that would also grant it more attention.  The work on Cid alone is largely unmatched by current media today.  Even advent Children's character work doesn't touch the detail on Cid.

I'd have to say, outside of the FF tag, Aki was the weakest link in an otherwise promising movie setup.  In both her visual design and character design, she really wasn't compelling enough a character to carry the story as she was supposed to.  Heck, I'd just about say that Sora is the successful form of Aki, and he doesn't even have the fake female sex appeal going for him.  The FF tag has probably been the key to the failure Spirits Within experienced. 
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Jutty on December 26, 2008, 11:33:28 am
Quote
it would have faded into obscurity with Savio Vega and Crystal Peps
  While the FF tag on it probably did more harm than good to the movie itself, I don't think it would've faded into obscurity without it.  First off, it was still a Square product, which that alone probably merits enough attention to be comparable to FF alone, plus the project design of using high detail cg to emulate people was an interesting undertaking at the time that would also grant it more attention.  The work on Cid alone is largely unmatched by current media today.  Even advent Children's character work doesn't touch the detail on Cid.

I'd have to say, outside of the FF tag, Aki was the weakest link in an otherwise promising movie setup.  In both her visual design and character design, she really wasn't compelling enough a character to carry the story as she was supposed to.  Heck, I'd just about say that Sora is the successful form of Aki, and he doesn't even have the fake female sex appeal going for him.  The FF tag has probably been the key to the failure Spirits Within experienced. 

I didn't say just Final Fantasy removed and it would have faded away. I said if it was made by a different company than Square without the Final Fantasy branding. Actually it's practically faded away into obscurity already. When is the last time you heard someone say, "Man I really want to watch that shitty final fantasy movie."
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: HyperNerd on December 26, 2008, 04:04:41 pm
Darkman: Your choice and Sig. contradict eachother. If I was here in time I would of picked both, Because I love them both even though I'm barely at Viper Manor the first time In Cross. I loved Trigger for 5 years straight and Cross for a month, but that doesn't mean I hate either of them. They, along with the FF series and the Mother series make up the Triangle of Godly RPG's (In my opinion)
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Acacia Sgt on December 26, 2008, 04:27:04 pm
I like both games. In general, both are my most favorite RPGs.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Shadow D. Darkman on December 26, 2008, 05:18:04 pm
Darkman: Your choice and Sig. contradict eachother.

(http://www.court-records.net/rips/bubble-objection.gif) (http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=2887661)
Click the pic!
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: Xenterex on December 29, 2008, 04:19:12 am
Quote
I didn't say just Final Fantasy removed and it would have faded away. I said if it was made by a different company than Square without the Final Fantasy branding. Actually it's practically faded away into obscurity already. When is the last time you heard someone say, "Man I really want to watch that shitty final fantasy movie."

Even then, that still doesn't negate the point I made in regards to its cg rendering quality.  If anything, being made my a company that isn't Square may have also then boosted its popularity as it then wouldn't have had any pre existing notions that follow from either being a FF or Square products.  Much like how the Tak game series has its success and following largely initiated because its inception wasn't produced by a known video game powerhouse.

"Nobody" says "Man I really want to watch that shitty final fantasy movie."  because that's a loaded question. Those that have any form of appreciation for the movie don't see it as 'shitty' and will actually watch it.  Furthermore, while  I don't know for certain how curriculum goes for animation majors anymore particularly at school's outside my interest, but at least from the courses my brother took for his degree just a few years back, they had a case study pertaining to FF:SW because of its utilization of complete cgi rendering to imitate human actors, and how the audience reacted to that.  As the first to do this, it has set a historical mark that I'm sure continues to be of interest to study for more than those outside your realm of interest.  If anything, I'd say the movie was released 'too soon' and had Square waited a few more years to release the movie (despite already taking 4 to make) and maybe had a few animation tweaks to go with it, I think the movie would have then had a better reception.
Title: Re: Chrono Trigger or Chrono Cross (or both?)
Post by: chrono eric on December 29, 2008, 06:24:14 pm
(http://www.court-records.net/rips/bubble-objection.gif) (http://objection.mrdictionary.net/go.php?n=2887661)
Click the pic!

Over-ruled.