partiacl physics

[Lu Su]

the steady state theory is about the formation of the universe
the steady______ theory is about fundamentel particals and the Hazon or Higgs Boson partical if found is what makes stuff, stuff

and as for your one in a million chance consider over 10,000 particals coliding at near the speed of light every second
and i quote

will black holes form, yes, but they will too small to see with the naked eye and evapoate almost imedatily aftr formation the chances of a stable black hole forming is very high

1 in 50000000 to be precise
the black holes that do form will be classified as stranglets so technically black holes won't form
i assume none of you get Horizon

oh and about my spelling Einstein couldn't spell due to Dyslexia are you saying he didn't know about black holes?

lu bu was a warrior of great strength lu su was a stragist

[Burning Zeppelin]

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

Actually, the properties of a black hole reverse information. Therefore, the black hole is actually a white block of anti-matter. And the even horizon is just a veil of mucus.

[cupn00dles]

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

Actually, the properties of a black hole reverse information. Therefore, the black hole is actually a white block of anti-matter. And the even horizon is just a veil of mucus.

So, basically, you're saying a block is the opposite of a hole?

[Radical_Dreamer]

...judging from your spelling, I doubt you actually even know the formal definition of a black hole.

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

But...but...a hole is where something ISN'T. How can a not-there have a color?

[MsBlack]

...judging from your spelling, I doubt you actually even know the formal definition of a black hole.

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

But...but...a hole is where something ISN'T. How can a not-there have a color?

An absence of light, causing what we see as black.

[Lu Su]

to be exact it absorbs, whatever to want to say, all energy it come near
as light is energy it is thus absorbed, etc
black is not a colour it is a lack of light

as for being a hole nothing is techinaly execpt a vacume as there is always something to fill this so called hole
thus a black hole being compresed matter, energy so compressed that when the gravational pull is great enough it can occupy a single point in space so a singularity is a better name however it rarely does occupy a single point so neither name is that accurate go figure

[cupn00dles]

Oh, yes. I feel much better now.

[MsBlack]

to be exact it absorbs, whatever to want to say, all energy it come near
as light is energy it is thus absorbed, etc
black is not a colour it is a lack of light

Eh? If I recall correctly, while light has energy, it's a form of electromagnetic radiation, which is not necessarily energy.

[Burning Zeppelin]

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

Actually, the properties of a black hole reverse information. Therefore, the black hole is actually a white block of anti-matter. And the even horizon is just a veil of mucus.

So, basically, you're saying a block is the opposite of a hole?

So what is the opposite of a hole, Mr. Iknoweverythingaboutholes.

[cupn00dles]

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

Actually, the properties of a black hole reverse information. Therefore, the black hole is actually a white block of anti-matter. And the even horizon is just a veil of mucus.

So, basically, you're saying a block is the opposite of a hole?

So what is the opposite of a hole, Mr. Iknoweverythingaboutholes.

I... don't know =[

[Lord J Esq]

to be exact it absorbs, whatever to want to say, all energy it come near
as light is energy it is thus absorbed, etc
black is not a colour it is a lack of light

Eh? If I recall correctly, while light has energy, it's a form of electromagnetic radiation, which is not necessarily energy.

Right you are. Energy isn't a physical substance; it's just a concept. It describes a physical system's capacity to do work.

[Daniel Krispin]

...judging from your spelling, I doubt you actually even know the formal definition of a black hole.

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

But...but...a hole is where something ISN'T. How can a not-there have a color?

An absence of light, causing what we see as black.

So black isn't a colour, then? And a hole that ISN'T... but... isn't a hole a non-entity, anyway? Don't all holes, well, simply not exist, save to denote the nonexistence of something else? But wait a second, a BH is a singularity, so it's actually a dense something, so wouldn't this make it the one sort of hole that actually IS something?

Heh. Somebody take me seriously. Please.

[Hadriel]

...judging from your spelling, I doubt you actually even know the formal definition of a black hole.

I know, I know! It's a hole, right? And it's BLACK, right? Basically, a hole that's black?

I really don't know how to react to you not making a serious post.  Part of that could be because it's almost 3 AM and I've just had one of the most harrowing days I've had in a while.

But in all seriousness, the formal definition of a black hole is simply an object which lies inside its Schwarzschild radius.

[Lu Su]

Eh? If I recall correctly, while light has energy, it's a form of electromagnetic radiation, which is not necessarily energy.

Right you are. Energy isn't a physical substance; it's just a concept. It describes a physical system's capacity to do work.
[/quote]
that still has to be proved photons are how energy can be transfered however they are fundamental particles the reason they have no mass because they dont "talk" with the Higgs Boson particals how ever this theory relies on a positive result from the geneva partical accelerator
also E=MC2 says energy is proportional to mass thus we can somewhat assume the mass is a form of energy this too has to be proved

[Lord J Esq]

I wasn't directing that comment at you, mister.