Author Topic: WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...  (Read 23156 times)

Lordchander

  • Time Traveler (+800)
  • *
  • Posts: 807
  • I might come back one of these days...
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #45 on: January 17, 2006, 02:30:27 am »
Bah, you can win, im not on for a fight anyway...

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #46 on: January 21, 2006, 07:06:02 pm »
Could someone translate that, I'm not sure what exactly he was saying... :(

Tonjevic

  • Chronopolitan (+300)
  • *
  • Posts: 328
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #47 on: January 21, 2006, 08:11:48 pm »
ahhh... I'm not sure... But I think he is implying that there are three different scenarios that could have happened (two of which are wrong anyway).

1) That lavos was part of the planet, and was created by it... (then again, who knows) THis is obviously wrong because we see lavos crashing.

2) This one is impossiple to decifer. I think he means that Lavos was  destroyed by the planet, or vice versa...

3) Lavos came to earth or was sent by an outside force.

Really, these fractured comments could be interpreted in different ways, so it is hard to 'translate'.

I think maybe he is one of those French Canadians who havent learnt English very well.

I'm not sure why he said 'thank', though.
Maybe he was like: Thanks, I know I rule. I just showeed you the real truth. You will bow down to me.
It's a shame we cant work out this defining theory.
Either that or he is very, fataly wrong.

Chrono'99

  • Guru of Reason Emeritus
  • God of War (+3000)
  • *
  • Posts: 3605
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #48 on: January 21, 2006, 09:18:54 pm »
I think he just meant that (1) Lavos was born on some planet, (2) which exploded for some reason and (3) propulsed Lavos to Crono's planet.

Tonjevic

  • Chronopolitan (+300)
  • *
  • Posts: 328
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #49 on: January 22, 2006, 12:14:40 am »
Quote from: Tonjevic
Really, these fractured comments could be interpreted in different ways, so it is hard to 'translate'.


See what I mean?

ChronoMagus

  • Chronopolitan (+300)
  • *
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #50 on: January 22, 2006, 12:24:30 am »
I am going with Chrono cuz why would Idrian switch from word planet to earth?

Paradox

  • Porrean (+50)
  • *
  • Posts: 89
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #51 on: January 22, 2006, 02:26:09 am »
Quote from: Lordchander
Ive never really been one for the Death Peak = Lavos Shell Theory, I mean look at the massive size of Death Peak, is it truly possible that Lavos could be THAT massive? I mean, we see what he looks like in 1999 and he is nothing like that size. How could he grow that big in 300 years. Especially since there is no nutrients left in the earth to feed on.

But yes, the Lavos Spawns could work the same way I spose. Maybe like Cacti they grow little pups on themselves then the pups fall off and grow!  :D


Sorry, just wanted to make a note here. I’m tired of people saying that the period 2400 or 2399 (whatever) is an era where all the lifeforce of the planet is gone and hope is lost. I DEFY THAT I do. There is still life left in the planet the seeds recovered sprouted, quickly at that. Not just in a single location and a single patch of dirt, but in two separate locations on the landmass and at different times. I believe the planet isn't dead at that point, or even dieing. I believe that Lavos didn't drain the planet to a point of death because the planet's energy doesn’t have a limit. It continuously gives off more and more energy or life. Lavos detached from its leechlike position on the planet in 1999 because it finally had enough energy to create its spawns. S'also why he attacked the surface, so that his spawns could roam and prepare before they too went in search of planets to drain for the energy they need to create spawns. Well, that’s my theory at least. Give the planet another thousand years and it'll be a right ol' bundle of life again fresh with (if humans don't make it) new species and beings until one day another intergalactic parasite lands and re-starts the cycle. Maybe this is the universes way of preserving the cycle of life? Let a civilization or species grow to it's peak then strike it down, letting the planet refresh itself then grow anew? I’m sorry; I get way too into this.

Theres my theory, the universes cycle of life for Earth and all life carrying planets.

Legend of the Past

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1679
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #52 on: January 22, 2006, 02:31:16 am »
We don't get one hint, one whisper towards Lavos' origin, so WHY try to theorize on something with NO evidence? People'll cook up all sorts of crazy theories and, unless they're totally stupid, get away with it!

Zaperking

  • Radical Dreamer (+2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 2210
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #53 on: January 22, 2006, 08:12:44 am »
I know, like what the hell..
Lavos may be a singularity..

Legend of the Past

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1679
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #54 on: January 22, 2006, 11:11:39 am »
Yeah, he doesn't have to be a race... Kato's already proven he doesn't let the angry fans get to him: He writes the story without changes to satisfy to masses. People might want millions of Lavos' on one Planet, but to hell with them, says I! Lavos is Lavos, and we won't know anymore until Kato will tell us.

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #55 on: January 22, 2006, 12:08:10 pm »
Quote from: Paradox
Quote from: Lordchander
Ive never really been one for the Death Peak = Lavos Shell Theory, I mean look at the massive size of Death Peak, is it truly possible that Lavos could be THAT massive? I mean, we see what he looks like in 1999 and he is nothing like that size. How could he grow that big in 300 years. Especially since there is no nutrients left in the earth to feed on.

But yes, the Lavos Spawns could work the same way I spose. Maybe like Cacti they grow little pups on themselves then the pups fall off and grow!  :D


Sorry, just wanted to make a note here. I’m tired of people saying that the period 2400 or 2399 (whatever) is an era where all the lifeforce of the planet is gone and hope is lost. I DEFY THAT I do. There is still life left in the planet the seeds recovered sprouted, quickly at that. Not just in a single location and a single patch of dirt, but in two separate locations on the landmass and at different times. I believe the planet isn't dead at that point, or even dieing. I believe that Lavos didn't drain the planet to a point of death because the planet's energy doesn’t have a limit. It continuously gives off more and more energy or life. Lavos detached from its leechlike position on the planet in 1999 because it finally had enough energy to create its spawns. S'also why he attacked the surface, so that his spawns could roam and prepare before they too went in search of planets to drain for the energy they need to create spawns. Well, that’s my theory at least. Give the planet another thousand years and it'll be a right ol' bundle of life again fresh with (if humans don't make it) new species and beings until one day another intergalactic parasite lands and re-starts the cycle. Maybe this is the universes way of preserving the cycle of life? Let a civilization or species grow to it's peak then strike it down, letting the planet refresh itself then grow anew? I’m sorry; I get way too into this.

Theres my theory, the universes cycle of life for Earth and all life carrying planets.

Okay, there was one seed they found.  And it eventually sprouted.  Do you know how long it took for it to do that?  No.  Are there any other vegitation on the planet at that time?  No.  Its a wasteland of mutants.  The planet produces alot of energy, and to an extent, its a renewable "resource".  But its just like blood.  We make new blood cells all the time to keep us going.  But drain us of our blood, and we die, even if we can make new blood.  Thats what was happening to the planet.  There was no way the planet was going to recover from Lavos.

knuck

  • Guardian (+100)
  • *
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #56 on: January 22, 2006, 01:42:30 pm »
I've read so much funny stuff here. XD
I mean, we all know that the overworld isn't proportional. We all know that everything is not to scale on the overworld. Why do you people even bother trying to compare Lavos' OW sprite to death peak's.

So yeah, if you say that Lavos is Death Peak based on overworld graphics, you might believe that birds are the size of a house and Crono can travel continents in 20 seconds.
Clever.

ChronoMagus

  • Chronopolitan (+300)
  • *
  • Posts: 349
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #57 on: January 22, 2006, 02:44:28 pm »
How many times must I restate this... Lavos is a parasite.  Whether he is from a race, higher order, or on his own, he is a parasite.  A parasite must suck out life from its host, but must not kill it.  The reason there still is an Earth and some life is because of the fact Lavos would die without a host to inhabit.

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #58 on: January 22, 2006, 02:47:07 pm »
Quote from: knuck
I've read so much funny stuff here. XD
I mean, we all know that the overworld isn't proportional. We all know that everything is not to scale on the overworld. Why do you people even bother trying to compare Lavos' OW sprite to death peak's.

So yeah, if you say that Lavos is Death Peak based on overworld graphics, you might believe that birds are the size of a house and Crono can travel continents in 20 seconds.
Clever.

Lets try not to be an ass unless you can back it up.

Obviously, somethings on the overworld are blown up, and out of proportion.  Thats because they have to be.  Your party for example, has to, otherwise you wouldn't be able to see them.  Same with houses.  They have to be blown up, so you can see to get inside them.

But for the most part, things on the overworld try to stay proportional in at least some ways.  Mountains are big on the overworld, because SUPRISE, they are supposed to be big.  Same could be said of Domes and such.  Lavos is shown to be big on the overworld because (you'll never believe this!) hes supposed to be big!  WOW!

knuck

  • Guardian (+100)
  • *
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
WHAA?? WAS LAVOS SENT TO EARTH?? maybe...
« Reply #59 on: January 22, 2006, 03:11:15 pm »
Quote from: Sentenal
Obviously, somethings on the overworld are blown up, and out of proportion.  Thats because they have to be.  Your party for example, has to, otherwise you wouldn't be able to see them.  Same with houses.  They have to be blown up, so you can see to get inside them.

But for the most part, things on the overworld try to stay proportional in at least some ways.  Mountains are big on the overworld, because SUPRISE, they are supposed to be big.  Same could be said of Domes and such.  Lavos is shown to be big on the overworld because (you'll never believe this!) hes supposed to be big!  WOW!
This is the most retarded logic I've heard. It's just an excuse so you can say "lol i think its big so its big".
Why don't you try something smarter and compare the Lavos1 sprite to the Death Peak map? They're both in the same scale, so you won't have to use that fucked up logic to prove your points.

hint hint spoiler: LAVOS ISNT BIGGER THAN ONE DEATH PEAK MAP

Quote from: Sentenal
But for the most part, things on the overworld try to stay proportional in at least some ways.
This made me lol btw. =D