Author Topic: Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&  (Read 3965 times)

SilentMartyr

  • Magical Dreamer (+1250)
  • *
  • Posts: 1373
    • View Profile
    • http://www.chronotrigger.info
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« on: October 28, 2005, 03:02:54 pm »
Quote from: Burning Zeppelin
Spekkio, like the Nus are genderless. Spekkio is like an angel.


Huh? Angel?? Where would you get that idea?

Dragoness

  • Guardian (+100)
  • *
  • Posts: 151
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #1 on: October 28, 2005, 08:00:44 pm »
Quote from: SilentMartyr
Quote from: Burning Zeppelin
Spekkio, like the Nus are genderless. Spekkio is like an angel.


Huh? Angel?? Where would you get that idea?


Well... Angels don't have a gender.

Sure, some of them are called "he".... but, I think they are genderless.

I could be wrong. >_>

Mystik3eb

  • Dimension Crosser (+1000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1022
    • View Profile
    • http://www.geocities.com/dfscanl/index.html
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2005, 08:03:45 pm »
Quote from: Dragoness
Quote from: SilentMartyr
Quote from: Burning Zeppelin
Spekkio, like the Nus are genderless. Spekkio is like an angel.


Huh? Angel?? Where would you get that idea?


Well... Angels don't have a gender.


...where did you get that idea?

Dragoness

  • Guardian (+100)
  • *
  • Posts: 151
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2005, 08:13:53 pm »
Quote from: Mystik3eb
Quote from: Dragoness
Quote from: SilentMartyr
Quote from: Burning Zeppelin
Spekkio, like the Nus are genderless. Spekkio is like an angel.


Huh? Angel?? Where would you get that idea?


Well... Angels don't have a gender.


...where did you get that idea?


*Shrug*

I must have read it somewhere.

and maybe I can blame some moives. >_>

I really don't know.

Heck! I could be wrong and angels do have genders. >_>

Zaperking

  • Radical Dreamer (+2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 2210
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2005, 08:20:14 pm »
Spekkio seems male. 1) He's tough and has the testosterone of like fighting you.
2) Maybe if it was Spekkia then i'd sound more feminim.

Radical_Dreamer

  • Entity
  • Zurvan Surfer (+2500)
  • *
  • Posts: 2773
    • View Profile
    • The Chrono Compendium
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2005, 10:47:24 pm »
Quote from: Mystik3eb
Quote from: Dragoness
Quote from: SilentMartyr
Quote from: Burning Zeppelin
Spekkio, like the Nus are genderless. Spekkio is like an angel.


Huh? Angel?? Where would you get that idea?


Well... Angels don't have a gender.


...where did you get that idea?


Where's Daniel Krispin when you need him the most?

AuraTwilight

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1524
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2005, 06:27:47 pm »
Angels having genders differs on the mythology or work of fiction. In the Bible, it seems to imply that angels are male. Atleast partially.

Zaperking

  • Radical Dreamer (+2000)
  • *
  • Posts: 2210
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2005, 07:27:43 pm »
And making God seem like a male with that white beard analogy. I think God is neither a he or she or it. It's more of a That. Otherwise there'd be sexual bism. Like a guy prays to God (and hes male) for beer and a sports channel, and it happens. A woman asks for an A cup and God gives her a DD. oo.

Dragoness

  • Guardian (+100)
  • *
  • Posts: 151
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2005, 07:45:31 pm »
Aha.

It doesn't help me that I read the Bible and some mythology.

and I get somewhat confused.

Sentenal

  • Errare Explorer (+1500)
  • *
  • Posts: 1948
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #9 on: October 29, 2005, 08:46:50 pm »
IF you were to give God a gender, as in the Christian God, I would say he is Male.  Firstly, there is God the Father, and God the Son, both of which implies male.  Then, when God created humans in his image, he created Man (as in male human).  There are others, but these are the main two of why I consider God to be Male.

Mystik3eb

  • Dimension Crosser (+1000)
  • *
  • Posts: 1022
    • View Profile
    • http://www.geocities.com/dfscanl/index.html
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #10 on: October 29, 2005, 09:03:32 pm »
If you're gonna argue that God exists, you might as well say God is married to a female God.

Really I personally find arguments over God pointless, because we're never gonna know until we die, unless some insane miracle happens where God actually comes down and talks with us.

I don't personally believe in personal revelation, because if it were true, then every damn person who's had one would be right, and that's impossible since so many damn people have had their own personal revelations or truth-giving experiences where they find out the truth...and they're all different.

Go ahead and argue if you want, but I'm just gonna wait and find out myself.

Chrono'99

  • Guru of Reason Emeritus
  • God of War (+3000)
  • *
  • Posts: 3605
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #11 on: October 29, 2005, 09:33:22 pm »
Quote from: Mystik3eb
Go ahead and argue if you want, but I'm just gonna wait and find out myself.

Go ahead and this topic about PORRE will be locked or split >_>

jthomp1286

  • Porrean (+50)
  • *
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #12 on: October 30, 2005, 01:27:03 am »
Quote from: Mystik3eb
...we're never gonna know until we die, unless some insane miracle happens where God actually comes down and talks with us.


He already did, remember Jesus?

knuck

  • Guardian (+100)
  • *
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #13 on: October 30, 2005, 01:50:52 am »
Quote from: jthomp1286


He already did, remember Jesus?
I really hope you'rte joking.
I also hope that you know there's no proof that Jesus existed or even worse, was son of "God".

jthomp1286

  • Porrean (+50)
  • *
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Religious discussion split from "Why did Porre Invade?&
« Reply #14 on: October 30, 2005, 02:01:22 am »
Quote from: knuck
Quote from: jthomp1286
He already did, remember Jesus?
I really hope you'rte joking.
I also hope that you know there's no proof that Jesus existed or even worse, was son of "God".


I'm insulted you think I'm joking. Try reading the Bible, more specifically the New Testament. Its all there. No proof He was the Son of Godf? Ever heard of the Trinity? The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit. God is the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit all in one. Before you say, that's not possible, remember, He's God. He can do things like that. The whole point of Him sending Jesus was so that God Himself could walk among us and teach us through Jesus. That's not to say Jesus wasn't a seperate person, but that's the beauty of it, He was and is both.