Messages

361

General Discussion / Re: The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 11, 2006, 06:01:16 pm »

how about this, i know its harder then it sounds, but why don't we just pull every allie troup from iraq, and let them deal with their own problems. because there is something more serious then the war in iraq.

362

General Discussion / Re: The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 09, 2006, 09:32:57 am »

Err, is it just me or is deciding to take over the SU not a small decision that some old man in the White House would decide to make because his tea was running cold? I mean, they did match US in military capabilities.

Heh, hating the SU is pretty ungrateful, seeing as how they destroyed Nazi Germany and all.

who's hating them? i just say we should have stopped them after WWII,plus stalin was one crazy ass man. and, doesn't seem that saddam almost looks like stalin?

363

General Discussion / Re: Help Crono Win!

« on: November 09, 2006, 02:20:11 am »

damn, crono better win, lool 

364

General Discussion / Re: The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 09, 2006, 01:50:13 am »

Uhhh... no. Frankly, taking Russia would have changed things, but it woulnd't have been a 'small' decision by any stretch, and it wouldn't have been the lack of the AK that would have made things different. Actually, the Germans wanted to strike east, ally with the allies as it were, at the end of the war, too.

thats not wat i meant of a small decision, i was talking about like, it was to be decided by one person, and all the person had to do was say whether to go into war with the Soviets or not, just a yes and no. that's the small decision i'm talking about.

and can someone comment on the iran and north korea deal? wwIII people, if we don't deal with them now, we might just brake out into wwIII, do not, whatsoever, DO NOT underestemate them. and another thing, taking Russia would have made a huge change, we would have more control in that area if we took them earlier. and if you think it wouldn't have made a difference with the wars we have fought, then where the heck do you think the weapons came from? well japan could have been one source, but thats not big enough. veitnam, they used aks, all those countries over there has aks, and where did aks come from, the soveits.

what i am saying here is that, it might not have stoped the wars that have been going on since during the cold war to now, from taking russia, but it would sure as hell make it easier for us to fight the wars.

365

General Discussion / Re: The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 09, 2006, 12:00:56 am »

but why in the hell did we go in to iraq in the first place? why did we move the war from afganistan (which is still going on) to iraq? was it to get saddam? not really, more like for the oil. gosh there's so many things i can tell you about the government, they lie through their teeth almost about everything, they cover-up almost everything too. but i won't get into that, i might just get into more trouble with the government.

366

General Discussion / Re: The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 08, 2006, 11:47:54 pm »

You are missing the point. If I make a gun, and give it to you, I have armed you. If you try to rob a store with the gun I have given you, I have not caused you to rob the store. The responsibility is purely yours. You are a robber, and the gun is merely a tool. Do you understand? If it wasn't the Soviets, it would have been someone else. Hell, the US has sold tons of weapons to countries that later turned hostile to the US. Weapons are the tools of war, rarely are they the cause of war.

if they didn't have guns, we wouldn't have problem killing them, ok? but we didn't supply iran & north korea with nuclear weapons. that should be the biggest concearn, i don't think anybody is taking those two countries seriously, but people better start caring.

367

General Discussion / Re: The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 08, 2006, 09:02:18 pm »

That Iraq has Soviet made weapons has nothing to do with the causes of the wars.

Yes it does, the Soviets supplied all those countries with weapons during the Cold War, and there wouldn't have been a Cold War if there weren't any Soviets. And there wouldn't be any Soviet weapons if we took control of Russia after WWII. And the US, UK, and our other allies would virtually be the only countries with weapons, er excuse me, with GOOD weapons. And I say we should take out North Korea, before they attack us with nukes, and before they send more nuclear technology to Iran. Or this might break out into World War III.

368

General Discussion / The Effect: War in Iraq

« on: November 08, 2006, 08:05:33 pm »

 Did you know that during World War II, Winstin Churchill said that after the war, that we and the UK should go into the Soviet Union and defeat them, so they won't be a communist country, and General Patton agreed with him. And so do I, the reason being: During the time of the Cold War, The Soviets massproduced weapons, tanks, airplanes, and so on, sold them to their neghbouring countries, like Iraq, Iran, Korea, and the countries who weren't our allies. What my point is, that the War in Iraq would have never happend if the Soviets were defeated after WWII, the Veitnam War (maybe) wouldn't have happend either, or the Gulf War, or any of the wars we fought from the Korean War to now. Because the Soviets supplied all of our enemies with weapons. Because what else country would they have got weapons from? Most of the Asian countries all got their weapons from Russia. Heck I don't think there would even be any terrorists, they would still be fighting with swords and stuff.

 AK's were made in 1947 (hence the name AK 47), if we went into Russia right after, or during World War II, and took the Soviets by surprise, and they wouldn't have made AKs, and massproduce them, and other weapons, we would have converted them to a democracy, there wouldn't be barley any wars or fighting.

It's strange how one small decision, can make a huge effect on the whole world.

369

Chrono / Gameplay Casual Discussion / Re: ..... sweet.....

« on: November 08, 2006, 01:29:51 am »

damn i want that magus one

370

Chrono / Gameplay Casual Discussion / Re: ..... sweet.....

« on: November 06, 2006, 10:34:41 pm »

you know.. I remember seeing a harle doll. lemme look for it....

I will sell my soul for that, plus a Riddel plushie.

That's right, my soul is worth two!

ahahaha....funny.

371

Chrono / Gameplay Casual Discussion / Re: ..... sweet.....

« on: November 06, 2006, 07:56:54 pm »

ooooo me wants to see it

372

Chrono / Gameplay Casual Discussion / Re: ..... sweet.....

« on: November 05, 2006, 05:17:12 pm »

dose arre awesome

373

General Discussion / Re: I've never played Chrono Cross!!

« on: November 04, 2006, 05:50:42 pm »

Look, just play the damn thing. -_-

i am gosh,jesus,god,judas priest.ahaha. and i've been playing it quite sometime, like 30 mins after i got it, which was like a day after i started this post thingy

374

Characters, Plot, and Themes / Re: Who is King Zeal?

« on: October 31, 2006, 11:51:16 pm »

i just gonna shur up now, u people are meaaaaaaan, now i'm gonna go emo, whaaaaaaa. lol, jk, but i am gonna shur up,now like, right, now? you know? yea...god stay on topic cheeseus price. ahhhhhh i can assure you i am not high...me lot candy ya

375

Characters, Plot, and Themes / Re: Who is King Zeal?

« on: October 31, 2006, 11:42:01 pm »

Dan, just stop digging your grave. We have the best guys on the forum on it. You're making it sound like Japanese translations can be done in an afternoon. It can't. Not a quality job anyway.

hey, hey hey, let me tell you something er ask, wtf does digging your grave?

Perhaps the phrase "Cut your losses" is more familiar to you. He's saying to just let things be on this topic.

uh....ey?