Chrono Compendium

Enhasa Halls - Chrono Series Analysis => Characters, Plot, and Themes => Topic started by: whytheheckdoicare on October 14, 2006, 04:33:14 pm

Title: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 14, 2006, 04:33:14 pm
I don't know if I missed something since I beat the game some five years ago, and remember almost everything, but all I remember is that Ozzie found Janus/Magus.

So uhh I'm saying who are they really? How did they meet? They're my fave characters and they have so little info...
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Corey Taylor on October 14, 2006, 04:50:01 pm
Janus was sent through time by I think Queen Zeal.... umm.... yeah and he landed where Ozzy was and I guess he proved his worthyness to Ozzy.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 14, 2006, 04:54:04 pm
uhh ok. How did Flea and Slash come into the picture? And how come they listened to Janus when THEY recued HIM
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Romana on October 14, 2006, 04:59:54 pm
...Janus was sent through time by Lavos, when the Gate appeared. -_- Its shown in a flashback when before the 2nd Magus battle.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Corey Taylor on October 14, 2006, 05:03:50 pm
You know what.... You can just take you're right answers and go somewhere else...god. I'm only kidding. But yeah that's the story... anything else
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Romana on October 14, 2006, 05:07:35 pm
I have no idea where Ozzie, Slash and Flea originated from, though. I especially don't want to know where Flea came from. :shock:
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 14, 2006, 05:18:42 pm
(Faf? I'm Jack...)

well uhh he's cool with his magic and all.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Romana on October 14, 2006, 05:22:46 pm
(Hey there! Weird name y'got here. :?)

I suppose... I really don't like any of them. Slash would have to be my favourite, though. After all, he's a swordsman. :D

Quote
Frog: It's been a while, Sir Slush!
Slash: That's Slash, you slimey dolt!
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Corey Taylor on October 14, 2006, 05:30:04 pm
Would you two like to share with the class what you're whispering back there? Well Flea if goofy as shiite (used as a cover-up for s#!t) and Slash is cool. I don't think anyone knows.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 14, 2006, 05:34:11 pm
well uhh no we wouldn't. lol

well Frog calls Flea a girl, calls Slash Sir Slugh, but what does he do to Ozzie?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ChibiBob on October 14, 2006, 06:55:56 pm
Frog doesn't have to say anything. Ozzie embarasses himself just by existing.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 14, 2006, 06:58:12 pm
lol I really want to know more about them. They rocks so much. And how did they get to the end of time?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ChibiBob on October 15, 2006, 02:01:39 pm
lol I really want to know more about them. They rocks so much. And how did they get to the end of time?

That's something I'm not quite sure we have a definitive answer on. I personally believe Lavos got a terrible case of the hiccups and the ensuing spontaneous Gates sent them to the Bend of Time. Other than that, not quite sure. Simple Chrono Trigger reference for the fans by the developers?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Romana on October 15, 2006, 02:12:43 pm
lol I really want to know more about them. They rocks so much. And how did they get to the end of time?
Simple Chrono Trigger reference for the fans by the developers?

Bingo.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 15, 2006, 03:39:29 pm
maybe... well where were they when that happened? Ozzie got dropped in his own dungeon by a cat and what about FLea and Slash? Also why did they defeat Lavos on the day of his destruction instead way back when he crashed? Now the planet will still die until 1999. Ehh oh well, I want to know how come Flea is a guy when he looks like a girl, dresses like a girl, etc.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Corey Taylor on October 15, 2006, 11:57:49 pm
Whe thay defeated Lavos it changed history. Lavos was the reason of the whole world going to shizzle and the reason that Chrono and company could time travel. I explained it horribly. Hopefully you understood it
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ChibiBob on October 16, 2006, 11:55:57 am
Also why did they defeat Lavos on the day of his destruction instead way back when he crashed? Now the planet will still die until 1999.

We've already discussed this to death -- you might want to research it a little more thoroughly using the Encyclopedia that Zeality so painstakingly wrote to explain these kinds of repetitive questions. Long story short, Crono and company couldn't very well follow Lavos to the center of the earth when he landed in 65,000,000 BC; they had little choice but to gate directly into the pocket dimension, or wait until 1999 AD when he resurfaced to attack him head-on.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: whytheheckdoicare on October 20, 2006, 11:41:22 pm
Ah-hah! Don't ask why I said that... But this is straying from the O.F.S. group!
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: nightmare975 on October 21, 2006, 01:03:19 am
Ah-hah! Don't ask why I said that

Because you don't care? :?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Luminflare on November 09, 2006, 03:55:17 pm
Hah. Although, the Japanese names were Mayonnaise (Flea), Soy Sauce(Slash), and... something... Ahh yes, Ozzie is Vinegar. I had to go look that up on Wikipedia. That may or may not have anything to do with anything.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Zaperking on November 09, 2006, 04:47:43 pm
I think they were named that way just because the Dream Team liked Flea (From Red Hot Chilli Peppers), Ozzie (Ozzy Osborne) an Slash from.. ahh.. I forgot that band.

Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Romana on November 09, 2006, 04:54:36 pm
I think they were named that way just because the Dream Team liked Flea (From Red Hot Chilli Peppers), Ozzie (Ozzy Osborne) an Slash from.. ahh.. I forgot that band.



He's from Guns 'n' Roses, no? :lee:
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Corey Taylor on November 10, 2006, 12:19:14 am
Yup. Guns 'n' Roses. Recently I saw a commercial on Slash. It was for Volkswagon.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Daniel Krispin on November 10, 2006, 04:01:41 am
I think they were named that way just because the Dream Team liked Flea (From Red Hot Chilli Peppers), Ozzie (Ozzy Osborne) an Slash from.. ahh.. I forgot that band.



He's from Guns 'n' Roses, no? :lee:

Currently? Velvet Revolver.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Radical_Dreamer on November 10, 2006, 06:37:36 am
I think they were named that way just because the Dream Team liked Flea (From Red Hot Chilli Peppers), Ozzie (Ozzy Osborne) an Slash from.. ahh.. I forgot that band.



He's from Guns 'n' Roses, no? :lee:

Currently? Velvet Revolver.

When Chrono Trigger was made, he was in Guns 'n' Roses. When rock history remembers him, it will be from Guns 'n' Roses.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Daniel Krispin on November 10, 2006, 08:32:48 pm
I suppose. But they'd you'd have to say which bad was he from, not is he from.

Actually, Guns 'n' Roses is playing here in my city in a few weeks. My brother's going to see them. Of course, the only people who are left are the infamous Axl (sporting a wig these days) and the keyboard player.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: V_Translanka on November 13, 2006, 09:55:03 pm
Hah. Although, the Japanese names were Mayonnaise (Flea), Soy Sauce(Slash), and... something... Ahh yes, Ozzie is Vinegar. I had to go look that up on Wikipedia. That may or may not have anything to do with anything.

Their names weren't exactly the condiments, just wordplays, or puns, on them...Ozzie was Binegar, Slash was Soyso but Flea was just Mayonnaise...wait...I don't understand that one...That's not different from just mayonnaise...>_>
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Ris on November 13, 2006, 11:50:18 pm
lol I really want to know more about them. They rocks so much. And how did they get to the end of time?

They don't necessarily have to have "gotten" to the Bend of Time, just like you can fight Tragediennes at the Bend of Time even though they aren't actually there.  Fighting any opponent is just something that can be done from the Bend of Time.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ChibiBob on November 14, 2006, 01:08:41 am
lol I really want to know more about them. They rocks so much. And how did they get to the end of time?

They don't necessarily have to have "gotten" to the Bend of Time, just like you can fight Tragediennes at the Bend of Time even though they aren't actually there.  Fighting any opponent is just something that can be done from the Bend of Time.

No, the trio are actually, physically, in the Bend of Time. There's no warping involved to fight them.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Luminflare on November 17, 2006, 03:10:58 pm
Well, what else did they have to do after their leader completetly came back after suffering total apparent destruction and proceeded to turn on them and destroy all their plans?
There probably is a logical explanation, the more important matter on that topic is: Who (or WHAT) exactly are those octopus looking thingies? Their form is probably deceptive of their power, as we recognize with Spekkio.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Azure on November 17, 2006, 04:53:18 pm
Woah woah...I still don't understand why Flea is a dude...Maybe a translation error? or where the creators just board of a "you see what you see" type of mind frame? :P
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: AuraTwilight on November 17, 2006, 06:48:23 pm
He's the effeminate, possibly gay Bishonen. It's a stereotype.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Saylandemon on November 19, 2006, 06:00:34 pm
I think he uses his appearance to catch opponents off guard.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Magus_Brokenhart on April 30, 2007, 05:52:54 am
He just finds the female form beautiful. Mystics can transform, so there is no reason he would not do so. If you have Robo in your party, even gets surprised and says that Flea has the exterior of a female. By his perception, one can assume that Flea has breasts and female genitals. Heck you can see his set in his art.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: thanatos on May 07, 2007, 11:26:59 pm
A thought that occurred to me. When you encounter Slash in Magus' Castle, Frog says, "It's been a while, Sir Slush." Does this point towards a meeting between the two at an earlier date? As far as the game tells you, aside from said quote, Frog should only know Magus and Ozzie. Thoughts?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Beeyo on May 08, 2007, 10:10:00 am
Frog was involved in the War against the Mystics in the middle ages before Crono came and stole his slimey thunder. So yeah they probably crossed paths a couple of times and had a crazy swordfight that we never got see. Wamp wamp.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Mavix on May 08, 2007, 06:23:40 pm
tell it to somone who cares. now walk the plank. skallywag. hahahahahahhahahahahhah.............muhahahahahahahhaha............ *Gunshots*
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: justin3009 on May 17, 2007, 04:54:46 pm
That was a horrible english translation for the game.  If you read the retranslation, the whole entire spot of that is completely different.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: GuruOfGaming on May 18, 2007, 11:38:03 pm
i always figured fleas particular species of mystic had reversed anatomy for the respective sexes (as in guys have girl parts and girls have guy parts) my first play through i expected to run into a decendent of flea that apeaered to be a burly mustashioed man and heve him proclam something along the lines of  "hey i'm a girl!", sadly that never happened. i also half expected to have that sort of theory (if you could call it that) on fleas whole little section along with the other proposed theorys, again sadly it wasent
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Magus_Brokenhart on May 23, 2007, 07:07:36 pm
Well, Guru, I think it should be self-evident that Flea just turns into a girl since Mystics can control their shape. Like how Sprigg turns into Ozzie and Slash in Chrono Cross. Flea is just naughty.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: GuruOfGaming on May 26, 2007, 01:39:23 am
haha yeah probably. But i can dream camt i?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on May 26, 2007, 07:07:41 pm
maybe she is a hemaphrodite but never took sex ED to discover that she is a woman with a non-functioning penis.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Mr. Molecule on June 02, 2007, 03:24:04 am
If Mystics can all change their shape, why don't Imps change to a more powerful shape?

Sprigg is a Mystic, and she can change shapes. Doesn't mean ALL Mystics can change shape. It's a skill some have. Chrono can use magic, but not ALL humans can use magic. Flea maybe can change shape. It's not really addressed. He's just... weird.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 02, 2007, 11:08:53 pm
I stick by my theory..........
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: DoomSickle on June 03, 2007, 01:10:20 am
If Mystics can all change their shape, why don't Imps change to a more powerful shape?

Sprigg is a Mystic, and she can change shapes. Doesn't mean ALL Mystics can change shape. It's a skill some have. Chrono can use magic, but not ALL humans can use magic. Flea maybe can change shape. It's not really addressed. He's just... weird.

Actually, it's proven that Flea CAN change shape. Remember the little bat that follows you around in Magus's castle? That bat turned into Flea when you fought her. Er, him. Shi? I don't know! D=
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 04, 2007, 02:56:29 am
theory of the mystic vampire, ready! set! GO!!!
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Magus_Brokenhart on June 07, 2007, 05:14:28 am
Well, maybe, like Sprigg, they would have to defeat a creature to collect their data before they could shift into it. Obviously a normal soldier would be an easy feat, but not something stronger than itself, thus, they could not turn into it.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Mr. Molecule on June 08, 2007, 03:40:54 pm
If Mystics can all change their shape, why don't Imps change to a more powerful shape?

Sprigg is a Mystic, and she can change shapes. Doesn't mean ALL Mystics can change shape. It's a skill some have. Chrono can use magic, but not ALL humans can use magic. Flea maybe can change shape. It's not really addressed. He's just... weird.

Actually, it's proven that Flea CAN change shape. Remember the little bat that follows you around in Magus's castle? That bat turned into Flea when you fought her. Er, him. Shi? I don't know! D=

Oh... right. Good point.

Still, that's two confirmed shape changers in an entire race that otherwise doesn't show much propensity to shapes changing. I think it'd be fairly silly to say all mystics are shape changers from that. Although I do concede that that's why Flea appears as a female.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Kyronea on June 08, 2007, 04:00:48 pm
Don't forget Yakra, both himself and his descendents, as another example.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on June 08, 2007, 04:48:10 pm
Not to mention the Naga-Ettes in the Cathedral.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 08, 2007, 06:11:09 pm
but yarka casted a spell im sure he did the same with the naggettes
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on June 08, 2007, 06:35:16 pm
Wow, really? I thought it was a costume. :roll:
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 09, 2007, 03:02:43 am
Wow, really? I thought it was a costume. :roll:

What I ment was that it was not his ability or tech but he found a spell for shapeshifting. he probably casted it on the nagga-ettes to gaurd the place as well.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on June 09, 2007, 05:13:50 am
Well given the Mystic's tendency for magic, it's obvious that it's a spell rather than an ability (or it's a... magic ability!). But yeah it's possible that the Naga-Ettes didn't shapeshift themselves. It's possible that they did learn to do it themselves though, seeing how Sprigg was even able to teach a shapeshifting-into-cat spell to Sneff, a human, in CC.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Magus_Brokenhart on June 10, 2007, 06:13:53 pm
Nagas, Yakras, Flea, Sprigg...Those are enough examples to assume that they can all use magic or abilities to transform. Again, like Sprigg they probably have to defeat something weaker than themselves. I don't see the Nagas having trouble defeating a soldier, Yakra defeating the Chancellor, or Flea with a mere bat. You only see Mystics transform, so that's probably their ability.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Mr. Molecule on June 10, 2007, 08:35:18 pm
If all Mystics can transform, why did they only establish one sleeper cell, and that in the relatively harmless Manoria Cathedral? There don't seem to be any mystics among the Knights of the Square Table, even though it's established that some Mystics are strong enough to beat said knights.

I still hold that it's a relatively small subset of mystics that can transform. After all, Chrono, Marle, Lucca, Frog, Magus and all the Zealians aren't enough examples to prove that all humans can wield magic.  :wink:

...that said, it's pretty much a moot point. Since it's not addressed specifically in-game, we can't know either way.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 13, 2007, 06:51:04 pm
sneff knows how to turn people to cats so not only mystics transform
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on June 14, 2007, 07:07:35 am
Sprigg was even able to teach a shapeshifting-into-cat spell to Sneff, a human, in CC.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 14, 2007, 11:14:04 am
when did that happen?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on June 14, 2007, 11:48:29 am
Quote
Sneff:
   I'm sorry, ffolks.
   Actually, there's absolutely
   no trick behind that magic.
   An old troll gave me a
   mysterious berry during
   my travels, long ago.
   She was saying someffing
   about the Bend of Time...
   Anyway, affter I ate the berry,
   I was able to transfform people
   into cats.

Additionally, the Fortune Teller of Termina is friend with both Sprigg and Guile, and Sneff knows Guile as the "rising star of the Magic Guild". This suggests that the old female troll Sneff is referring to in this quote may be Sprigg.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 18, 2007, 04:09:26 pm
Then the berry gave him the ability so dose that mean all mystics ate the berry?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on June 19, 2007, 06:01:41 am
No.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 19, 2007, 08:17:27 pm
then that means that sprigg ate the berry

EDIT: I actually meant this to be a joke. ^ Just so you know....
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZeaLitY on June 19, 2007, 10:43:31 pm
No.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 22, 2007, 06:12:05 pm
What I'm trying to say is do we have proof that every mystic can change shape. I mean why do Blue Imps want to stay that shape they look so week and powerless, they could look like Ozzie if they wanted.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: DaVoid on September 02, 2007, 03:33:14 pm
perhaps only mystics of a certain power level had the magical fortitude needed to be able shapeshift.  Which is why the regular grunts don't change shapes because they are just don't have the power needed to do it.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Generality on September 06, 2007, 05:28:20 pm
They're Mystics. There's not much more to it than that. They were probably the three most powerful or influential of their race, and so naturally rose into leadership positions.

Of course, I would like to see more about their exact history, but there are vast swathes of history in the CT universe that are unexplained and which I would like to see.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Loki Fenrisulf on September 12, 2007, 05:15:27 pm
...Why just because some Mystics can transform whe must assume all mystics can transform? Many people can contort, but not all people. Many people can ride a bike, but not all people. Many people can eat sugar without having health problems due to diabetes, but not all people can.
Just because some Mystics can transform, we can't assume all can. Either it is an ability that needs training, a common one they were unable to learn or something related to health, by what we have until now, unless we are told otherwise we can only assume that some can and some can't.

...Am I the only one that thinks the reason Flea looks like a girl is because he is a travestite? What, there can't be gay videogame characters?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: V_Translanka on September 13, 2007, 08:09:38 pm
Yeah, but Flea seems to think of himself as a guy, but that the physical form of a girl is more beautiful, and thus, "more powerful"...I don't know if I'd call Flea gay, but there's some definite and serious emotional issues there.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: maggiekarp on September 16, 2007, 10:36:33 pm
Didn't the Flea bra have some sort of description to it saying that Flea wore it so he looked like he would have tits?


Meaning he doesn't actually have breasts and is just a feminine-looking guy? Then again, if he is a shape-shifter, he could just magic himself some tits...


...Oh, bah. Flea was MEANT to be confusing.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: V_Translanka on September 18, 2007, 09:55:43 pm
I find the original name even more confusing...Mayonnaise?!?! Is that some kind of sick innuendo?!?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: maggiekarp on September 18, 2007, 09:57:42 pm
They liked to name their characters after random English-ish words in Japan land around the time CT came out. Especially that Toriyama guy. Besides that, he's a bit more blatant with his sexual innuendo... ever see Garlic Jr.'s throne?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: V_Translanka on September 18, 2007, 10:07:16 pm
Yeah, but Flea is so obviously not a blatant character that anything involving him would have to be innuendo...But it is odd that he's the only one that they didn't change the actual word to something that just looks/sounds like the actual word...like Binegar & Soyso...V_V
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on September 19, 2007, 06:56:47 am
Actually Flea's Japanese name lacks the final syllable of "Mayonnaise". His name is Mayonnai, Mayonnay, Mayonnee, or however you want to spell it.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: V_Translanka on September 26, 2007, 08:51:09 pm
Oh, well, sonofabitch...Then someone should change his Compendium entry...V_V
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Corona!01 on October 20, 2007, 11:00:20 pm
Oh, well, sonofabitch...Then someone should change his Compendium entry...V_V
Agreed beyond the boundary of words, Wikipedia has it wrong too. If you guys want the real details behind Flea's shapeshifting abilities, consider these into effect: Only certain Mystics have incredibly potent magic in the first place, as has been covered, but can ALL OF THEM USE THE EXACT SAME KINDS OF MAGIC? There might be certain elements/innates/whatever to their abilities such as there are with humans and Robo, whose weapons classify as Shadow damage. If anyone's heard ALL the information about Flea, he's classified as something called a Void Mage. If you factor in that he's clearly a high-lever magician, possibly with a rare innate, then it's obvious that there's a reason not many Mystics can shapeshift. There might be a similar spell that allows you to hold a form for so long, as Yakra and the Naga-ettes have proven, perhaps even an item that does it such as the notorious berry from earlier in the thread. Maybe that spell is a weaker or watered-down version available to those who aren't quite as powerful/experienced or something like that. (I write about a similar character, so I kinda have a strong grasp on Flea's workings)

Anyone think I'm hitting the target on this at all? If so, that ought to satisfy your need for knowing why Mr. Mayonae has the ability to look good in a skirt.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: SirSabin on December 15, 2007, 01:47:42 am
I, too, am a fan of the bumbling trio of mystics; Slash especially. It would be nice to hear some more of their history.

As to Flea, although all the evidence points to her being a him, I still prefer to think of him as a her.

And if I were to recreate the CT game, I would drop all of the innuendo about whether Flea is a male or female, and simply make 'her' a female mystic.

The only problem is that Slash, Flea, and Ozzie all seem to be the only individuals of their particular species that we see in the entire game. Maybe they're all actually just imps who, being mystics, managed to somehow grow into much more powerful versions of the regular imps. Anyone else have thoughts on their particular species?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: FaustWolf on December 15, 2007, 01:58:06 am
Here, here, SirSabin and Corona! I'm not the only "Flea = physically female" holdout after all. He's just like Sprigg, er, something.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Kebrel on December 15, 2007, 02:14:48 am
The only problem is that Slash, Flea, and Ozzie all seem to be the only individuals of their particular species that we see in the entire game. Maybe they're all actually just imps who, being mystics, managed to somehow grow into much more powerful versions of the regular imps. Anyone else have thoughts on their particular species?
Maybe they are imps, Imps could be like how we normally view vampires. Not blood sucking creatures of the night, but a vast difference in power between a new childe, and the legendary Antediluvians. Young imps are common and pathetic, yet the older or more pure an imp is the more powerful they become.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZeaLitY on December 15, 2007, 06:03:30 pm
"Impish" was an adjective. But I'll change it anyway.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Boo the Gentleman Caller on February 29, 2008, 06:28:01 pm
i read a cross-study of the demi-Humans of Trigger/Cross one time that explained all this...  i thought it was here on the site somewhere.  then again, i found it about three and a half or four years ago.  i printed it out and i think i still have it.  i'm gonna track it down.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: deviant_ambition on May 01, 2008, 07:10:37 am
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v133/Gamer4Life07/Kevin/facepalm.jpg)

Quote from: Flea
"Male, female, what's the difference?  Power is beautiful and I have the power!"

My guess is that subconsciously, as Flea gained power, he also bent the gender-roles.

The Flea Vest (jap. Mayonnaise's Bra), as stated http://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Flea_Vest.html (http://"here"), makes him look feminine.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: GuruOfGaming on March 08, 2009, 05:35:20 am
First i know old toipc is old but it's a topis i like and one that dosent have a mess of pages to nagigate through, though in hte end if its prefer able to make a new topic i will appoligize and do so
ANYWAY!

The Flea Vest (jap. Mayonnaise's Bra), as stated http://www.chronocompendium.com/Term/Flea_Vest.html (http://"here"), makes him look feminine.

thats sort of broad isnt it? i mean in person im obviously a male, no real two ways about it. BUT, if i happen to be decked out in lipstick mascara and a frilly pink skirt, one could say I look feminine, so anyone wearing a bustier styled vest could make them look feminine.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Colin on March 11, 2009, 12:37:14 pm
Oh, well, sonofabitch...Then someone should change his Compendium entry...V_V
Agreed beyond the boundary of words, Wikipedia has it wrong too. If you guys want the real details behind Flea's shapeshifting abilities, consider these into effect: Only certain Mystics have incredibly potent magic in the first place, as has been covered, but can ALL OF THEM USE THE EXACT SAME KINDS OF MAGIC? There might be certain elements/innates/whatever to their abilities such as there are with humans and Robo, whose weapons classify as Shadow damage. If anyone's heard ALL the information about Flea, he's classified as something called a Void Mage. If you factor in that he's clearly a high-lever magician, possibly with a rare innate, then it's obvious that there's a reason not many Mystics can shapeshift. There might be a similar spell that allows you to hold a form for so long, as Yakra and the Naga-ettes have proven, perhaps even an item that does it such as the notorious berry from earlier in the thread. Maybe that spell is a weaker or watered-down version available to those who aren't quite as powerful/experienced or something like that. (I write about a similar character, so I kinda have a strong grasp on Flea's workings)

Anyone think I'm hitting the target on this at all? If so, that ought to satisfy your need for knowing why Mr. Mayonae has the ability to look good in a skirt.

I agree totally with this statement, like humans and such, we all are different and maybe some mystics have abilities others do not, hence why Flea is a high ranking officer in their army and not a lowly grunt guarding the cathedral.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Mr Bekkler on April 02, 2009, 01:23:52 am
Humans can shapeshift too in this chronoverse. Remember Magus and Frog. Frog was against his will but Magus definitely looked less vampirish as a child, and I highly doubt that a more powerful magician than Flea would use "artificial" or "superficial" products to change himself. I think it's just a really complicated permanent spell, and Yakra and the Nagaettes used the easier, temporary version.

As for Ozzie and Slash, we know Ozzie stuck around, as his descendant is the Mayor of Medina in 1000, and Slash's lips look an awful lot like the Mutant's lips from 2300. I'm not making a serious connection there, but there is very loose evidence that they live after Crono&co.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: FaustWolf on April 02, 2009, 04:11:47 am
Something interesting that utunnels just found and shared with a hidden fan project in development, and I figured I'd toss it out here to see how everyone interprets it:

Quote from: utunnels
It seems "Void Mage(空魔土)" was translated as Sky Djinn in Chrono Cross:
空魔士のリング/Sky Djinn Ring

The character 空 has several meanings, one of them is "empty", another is "sky".

Whimsical translation of "Void Mage" from Japanese to English? Or does this suggest that Flea is a gender-bending genie, and he in fact popped out of that oil lamp he's always wearing? What's everyone's thoughts on this translation curiosity?
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Chrono'99 on April 02, 2009, 04:24:14 am
Interesting... But is Djinn a direct translation, or is it a case of Richard Honeywood using a different term in English than what was in the original version? (Though I guess in the latter case the oil lamp would be quite a huge coincidence...)
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: utunnels on April 02, 2009, 04:59:36 am
Djinn...I never heard about such a word until I saw it in CC.
A direct translation should be Mage/Magician, like the CT retranslation.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Alcyone on April 02, 2009, 05:02:42 am
I looked up the kanji in an online dictionary.

空 - sky, air, empty, vacancy, vanity, space, void
魔 - demon, devil, evil spirit, mystic power
土 - soil, earth, clay, ground, mud

It sounds like it could probably be translated either way.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: utunnels on April 02, 2009, 05:13:55 am
 (man/person) isn't equal to (soil)
Although they looks alike. :?

魔士 is short for 魔導士, Mage/Magician.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Alcyone on April 02, 2009, 05:23:06 am
Your earlier post had the character for soil, not person. XD Person definitely makes more sense though. I guess it really is magician then.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: utunnels on April 02, 2009, 05:26:16 am
Your earlier post had the character for soil, not person. XD Person definitely makes more sense though. I guess it really is magician then.
LOL
Hmm, that is...well, my mistake.
BTW, the default font size is too small to display those things.



Ahh, wait, I just copied it from CT retranslation script, so someone must have made a mistake.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: Alcyone on April 02, 2009, 05:31:41 am
They look fine in that font size on my computer. .__.;

Um... yeah, I guess someone did make a mistake. @__@

Also, apparently, genie is 魔神 in Japanese.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: tushantin on April 03, 2009, 12:13:17 am
 :lol: Shapeshifting was common among the Mystics in 600 AG. Or perhaps only a few sentient Mystics possessed it.

Regardless, considering a Flea as a Djinn (and not a Genie, mind you) is possible. Mystics are essentially Fiends, and Flea had quite an intellect, arrogance, sense of humor and malice, and great magical proficiency.

According to what I've researched till now, most Djinns tend to take (and often stick to) a form they love most. Flea was a vanity type, and thus he chose a feminine body for some strange reason. XD
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on April 03, 2009, 10:11:04 pm
Actually didn't the Genie in Magus's Castle in Flea's Hall transform not only himself, but the skeletons too? Actually a lot of things in Magus's Castle transform
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: mav on April 04, 2009, 12:51:53 am
:lol: Shapeshifting was common among the Mystics in 600 AG. Or perhaps only a few sentient Mystics possessed it.

Regardless, considering a Flea as a Djinn (and not a Genie, mind you) is possible. Mystics are essentially Fiends, and Flea had quite an intellect, arrogance, sense of humor and malice, and great magical proficiency.

According to what I've researched till now, most Djinns tend to take (and often stick to) a form they love most. Flea was a vanity type, and thus he chose a feminine body for some strange reason. XD
Flea as a djinn makes some sense, but so does genie. Although the word genie has a different connotation in the West, right: people may think of the wish-granting, Aladdin's lamp type, but if you look at the historical mythology of genies it applies just as well. Genies are known to shape-shift and act arrogantly, but most importantly they're known as tricksters. Furthermore I recall hearing that genie, or jinni, may be translated as "hiding" or "concealing" or something of the like--Flea could easily be "hiding" (as a bat) from Crono and co, and "concealing" his identity by taking the form as a woman. I think some Zoroastrians believe in a type of djinn/genies that are exclusively evil female spirits...While other religions look at them as either evil spirits/devils or creatures akin to man.

I kinda jumped into this late, so feel free to disregard my post, but I've often thought that Mystics were very similar to the concept of djinns in various other cultures.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: xcalibur on June 10, 2009, 08:47:36 am
my opinion is that mystics can shapeshift, but its takes magical power to do so.. the more powerful the mystic, the better they would be at shapeshifting. of course, not all choose to shapeshift and not all may use magic that lets them shapeshift, but thats the jist of it.

i see flea as a tranvestite or transexual. as to his/her true nature, who knows. id like to know more about the 3 mystic leaders, it seems that their history was left blank.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 10, 2009, 09:41:32 pm
Flea as a djinn makes some sense, but so does genie. Although the word genie has a different connotation in the West, right: people may think of the wish-granting, Aladdin's lamp type, but if you look at the historical mythology of genies it applies just as well. Genies are known to shape-shift and act arrogantly, but most importantly they're known as tricksters. Furthermore I recall hearing that genie, or jinni, may be translated as "hiding" or "concealing" or something of the like--Flea could easily be "hiding" (as a bat) from Crono and co, and "concealing" his identity by taking the form as a woman. I think some Zoroastrians believe in a type of djinn/genies that are exclusively evil female spirits...While other religions look at them as either evil spirits/devils or creatures akin to man.

I kinda jumped into this late, so feel free to disregard my post, but I've often thought that Mystics were very similar to the concept of djinns in various other cultures.

Actually Mav bring up a good point. Mystics do share a lot in common with Arab and Muslims. Not only is Medina the Arabic word for city but it is also an important muslim city. Djinn are kinda a Arab thing too right? Perhaps this is the point of all mystics. They are really just Djinn, Genie one is just because it looks like a western depiction. That's why they all change shape. And it does come from the arabic root for "conceal" or "hide". More importantly there is a type of djinn that disguises itself as a woman and tests man. This type of jinn is called mardāzmā, which translates to "man tester".
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: mav on June 11, 2009, 12:29:27 am
Righto, ZealKnight. Djinn are creatures that appear heavily in Arabian lore as well as Islamic lore (since the two aren't mutually exclusive). And from my understanding, djinn in Islam are also akin to the Western perception of devils/demons; like djinn, Mystics are also called/compared to/considered demons.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: xcalibur on June 11, 2009, 09:37:36 am
indeed. also, i read somewhere on the compendium that magus & the mystics war against humans is comparable to muhammad and the jihad.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: mav on June 11, 2009, 05:30:35 pm
Eh, that's pushing it...since the concept of Jihad has been dramatized quite heavily, but that may be an interesting read. I suppose the idea of holy war is comparable to the Mystic War, but so is every war: you have two groups struggling for supremacy, each group sees the other as the enemy, people are misguided, etc.
Title: Re: Ozzie, Flea, and Slash
Post by: ZealKnight on June 11, 2009, 06:28:45 pm
They share a history but the jihad is a misunderstanding. It is the Crusade though as in the West attacking the Middle East, but the Mystics are not taking it at all.